Re: [ietf-smtp] [Shutup] Proposed Charter for the "SMTP Headers Unhealth

Thursday, Dec 3, 2015 6:37 AM Rich Kulawiec wrote:
> This is an excellent point which bears repeating.
No point bears repeating, particularly an assertion that solution X works for 
problems Y and Z without giving specifics.   Repeating the same assertion over 
and over again does not make it more true, and it is not the case that the 
other readers of this mailing list did not understand it when you said it the 
first time.

That said, as Dave Crocker pointed out, the actual topic of this thread is 
supposed to be whether we want to have a working group that does an analysis of 
this problem.   It seems that you care quite a bit about this, and given the 
current industry trend toward more header privacy, it seems to me that you 
would want to be able to take some time to do the work to provide data to back 
up the assertion that you are saying is so important.   So can we take your 
assertion as support for forming such a working group, and a willingness to 
participate in it?


--
Sent from Whiteout Mail - https://whiteout.io

My PGP key: https://keys.whiteout.io/mellon(_at_)fugue(_dot_)com

pgpbZhtwSFivR.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
ietf-smtp mailing list
ietf-smtp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp