Re: [ietf-smtp] [Shutup] Proposed Charter for the "SMTP Headers Unhealth

Tuesday, Dec 1, 2015 6:49 PM Martijn Grooten wrote:
> Sure, making such changes on your own is probably going to hurt more          
>                                                                               
>                                                                               
>     
> than it helps. Which seems a good argument in favour of some kind of          
>                                                                               
>                                                                               
>     
> RFC, or at least a WG discussing whether one is needed.                       
>                                                                               
>                                                                               
>     
Yup, what I'm getting from this conversation is that we ought to try to gain a 
bit more clarity than we currently have on this question.   I'm hearing a lot 
of hand-wavey protests, but when I try to dig deeper it's not clear that much 
analysis has actually occurred.   That analysis would be worthwhile to do and 
to write up as an informational draft.   I think the informational draft should 
_make no recommendations_ but should just talk about the various use cases.


--
Sent from Whiteout Mail - https://whiteout.io

My PGP key: https://keys.whiteout.io/mellon(_at_)fugue(_dot_)com

pgpPRY7DmRrOC.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
ietf-smtp mailing list
ietf-smtp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp