In article <5692DAE2(_dot_)2050107(_at_)bluepopcorn(_dot_)net> you write:
-=-=-=-=-=-
-=-=-=-=-=-
Below is the announcement of a draft I just submitted that may be of
interest to this list. The approach here is complementary to the other
proposals I have seen along these lines (e.g., smtp-sts).
Thoughts, reviews, etc. welcomed.
Interesting idea. I implemented it on my server mail1.iecc.com.
R's,
John
PS: Of course, there's no way you can tell whether it'll actually do
anything different if you set requiretls. The inability to detect,
much less penalize, lying strikes me as a problem.
_______________________________________________
ietf-smtp mailing list
ietf-smtp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp