On 24/05/2016 17:59, Carl S. Gutekunst wrote:
On 05/24/2016 01:32 AM, Paul Smith wrote:
Just as a matter of interest - wouldn't it be worth them using macros
in their includes? eg 'include:%{i4r}.spf.ebay.com'. This could cut
down drastically on the level of nesting.
In my experience, SPF macros are not well/reliably supported across
proprietary implementations.
Wow, really? That's like saying 'we support IMAP4, but not the SEARCH
command' and not expecting any problems.
Interesting, (since Mandrill's Ts&Cs changed) we've started using
SparkPost for transactional email. Their SPF record is (a) "bad" because
it uses ptr which is now deprecated, and (b) uses macros (albeit in
exists, not include):
v=spf1 exists:%{i}._spf.sparkpostmail.com ptr:sparkpostmail.com
ptr:spmta.com ~all
_______________________________________________
ietf-smtp mailing list
ietf-smtp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp