1. It's not my proposal. I merely offered some wordsmithing to
characterize an approach that has been suggested.
On 2/18/2020 11:12 AM, John C Klensin wrote:
The difficulty I see
is that the language in RFC 2026 seems very clear to me: "no
known technical omissions with respect to the requirements
placed upon it" without an explicit IESG waiver for Proposed
Since the goal for the effort described in the text I offered is for
full standard and not proposed, I have no idea what your reference,
here, pertains to.
ietf-smtp mailing list