Many thanks. Is "cketti" the name you want in the
acknowledgments? Otherwise, please supply a name (send to me
directly if you prefer).
This will be in rfc5321bis-04 when it is posted (although that
still probably won't be until after we have a WG).
Stay safe and well,
john
--On Sunday, May 3, 2020 22:22 +0200 cketti <ck(_at_)cketti(_dot_)de> wrote:
On 03.05.20 19:45, John C Klensin wrote:
The first paragraph of Section 4.1.2 of RFC 5321 (and
rfc5321bis-03) concludes with
"Terminals not defined in this document, such as ALPHA,
DIGIT, SP, CR, LF, CRLF, are as defined in the "core"
syntax in Appendix B of RFC 5234 [5] or in the message
format syntax in RFC 5322 [11]."
So you can't say "no reference..." However, it has been
clear to me for some time that turning that statement into a
specific list of productions defined in 5334 (not "such as"
handwaving) and a separate list of productions defined in
5322 and then indexing both would be a considerable
improvement. If someone wants to do the work of preparing
those lists, I'd be happy to fold them into 5321bis and
provide an acknowledgment.
From RFC 5234:
- ALPHA
- DIGIT
- SP
- CRLF
- HEXDIG
From RFC 5322:
- atext
- FWS
- CFWS
CR and LF are not used in ABNF rules.
_______________________________________________
ietf-smtp mailing list
ietf-smtp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp
_______________________________________________
ietf-smtp mailing list
ietf-smtp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp