Re: [ietf-smtp] DKIM and DMARC, Email explained from first principles

Dave Crocker writes:

> > That was definitely true at one point. Based on today's numbers that I  
> > looked at the mainstream adoption of DKIM sadly diluted its early value as a  
> > spam indicator, ironically.
> You seem to have fixated on using the existence of a signature as indicating  
> goodness or badness.  Since it isn't intended to do that, please stop  
> casting the issue in terms of whether it accomplishes that.
I understand, very well, what the intent of DKIM is.

However, it is what it is. If I observe what the practical reality of the  
past or current usage of DKIM is, then this speaks for itself.

pgpP94PqJEUWa.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
ietf-smtp mailing list
ietf-smtp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp