Re: [ietf-smtp] DKIM and DMARC, Email explained from first principles
2021-05-25 21:20:09
On 5/25/2021 7:11 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Dave Crocker writes:
Actually, no, that's not what I said. Bad actors are always the first
to adopt the newest anti-spam technologies, to abuse those
unfortunates who interpret DKIM the way you described.
DKIM establishes a clean (noise-free) channel from the signer, which
means that any assessment about them really is about them. If they
are bad actors, that is a lot easier to assess, as is if they are good
actors.
Ah, but the first paragraph's the rub. That's why I saw DKIM-Signature:
as a spam indicator: the bad actors' initial take-up of DKIM-Signature:
was quite noticable.
That was definitely true at one point. Based on today's numbers that I
looked at the mainstream adoption of DKIM sadly diluted its early value
as a spam indicator, ironically.
You seem to have fixated on using the existence of a signature as
indicating goodness or badness. Since it isn't intended to do that,
please stop casting the issue in terms of whether it accomplishes that.
One more time:
1) DKIM creates a noise free channel of mail associated with the
signing identifier.
2) A noise-free channel permits accurate assessment of the actor
associated with the identifier.
3) Assessment is a separate process from identification; DKIM does
identification.
You can't really have both. Either you "formulate your own criteria", or
you'll outsource your spam filtering.
Well, actually, you CAN do both, if you want. But whether you can or
not is irrelevant to any of the points I was making...
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
ietf-smtp mailing list
ietf-smtp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Email explained from first principles, (continued)
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Email explained from first principles, Sam Varshavchik
- Re: [ietf-smtp] DKIM and DMARC, Email explained from first principles, John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] DKIM and DMARC, Email explained from first principles, Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] DKIM and DMARC, Email explained from first principles, Sam Varshavchik
- Re: [ietf-smtp] DKIM and DMARC, Email explained from first principles, John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] DKIM and DMARC, Email explained from first principles, Sam Varshavchik
- Re: [ietf-smtp] DKIM and DMARC, Email explained from first principles, Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] DKIM and DMARC, Email explained from first principles, Sam Varshavchik
- Re: [ietf-smtp] DKIM and DMARC, Email explained from first principles, Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] DKIM and DMARC, Email explained from first principles, Sam Varshavchik
- Re: [ietf-smtp] DKIM and DMARC, Email explained from first principles,
Dave Crocker <=
- Re: [ietf-smtp] DKIM and DMARC, Email explained from first principles, Sam Varshavchik
- Re: [ietf-smtp] DKIM and DMARC, Email explained from first principles, Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] DKIM and DMARC, Email explained from first principles, John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] DKIM and DMARC, Email explained from first principles, Sam Varshavchik
- Re: [ietf-smtp] DKIM and DMARC, Email explained from first principles, Nathaniel Borenstein
- Re: [ietf-smtp] DKIM and DMARC, Email explained from first principles, John C Klensin
- Re: [ietf-smtp] DKIM and DMARC, Email explained from first principles, Matthias Leisi
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Email explained from first principles, Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Email explained from first principles, John R Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Email explained from first principles, Kaspar Etter
|
|
|