ietf-smtp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-smtp] sm8: bogus SMTPUTF8? (was: How is EAI mail implemented ?)

2021-06-16 13:46:23
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021, John Levine wrote:

It was locally injected with "sendmail 
-fuser1(_at_)xn--5nq21jyu9d1ta(_dot_)xn--5nqx41au4nqohsp3axcg(_dot_)xn--fiqs8s
 atest(_at_)xn--fct(_dot_)xn--5nqx41au4nqohsp3axcg(_dot_)xn--fiqs8s"

Do you still have that "shim" (mentioned in a usenet posting)?
  In my tests I worked around it with a one line shim that always adds
  -U to the sendmail command and my guess is that everyone will do that.
Hopefully not -- because currently sendmail doesn't "downgrade",
i.e., it does not check whether SMTPUTF8 could be removed
(maybe this might be implemented in a future version).

-- 
Address is valid for this mailing list only, please do not reply
to it direcly, but to the list.

_______________________________________________
ietf-smtp mailing list
ietf-smtp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp