On 17/08/2021 22:37, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 10:19 AM John C Klensin <john-ietf(_at_)jck(_dot_)com>
wrote:
[...]
* treat this a something new, with a new header field name, and
proceed to describe that new thing. Presumably that should
include a discussion of why it is different and implementations
should provide it instead or in in addition to Delivered-to,
Envelope-to, Received...for, and anything else that is
considered particularly relevant, [...]
I would like to take this opportunity, given the number of implementers in
the room (guten tag, Claus!), to ask:
Hypothetically, if this work were to take the path of declaring a new code
point for this purpose, what's the likelihood of adoption?
Please note "instead of or in addition to" in the sentiment above.
From an Exim implementor's POV, I'd want to know "what's the purpose?"
before answering. Lacking a compelling one, I see no incentive.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
_______________________________________________
ietf-smtp mailing list
ietf-smtp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp