On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 12:20:01AM +0900, MURATA Makoto wrote:
However, even in this case, I
am sympathetic to Martin's worry ("we start to get into a patchwork").
In all other cases, I do not want to allow omission of the charset
parameter. How do others feel?
Do we know that all existing application/*+xml types define the charset
param by reference to 3023? If so, then I agree; I believe that the
benefit of this simplification outweighs the cost of (potential)
redundancy.
Mark.
--
Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca