Ian King wrote:
I'd suggest that address assignment
policy should keep process lightweight, so that it is realistic for
businesses to regularly ask for assignments in more granular chunks; rather
than grabbing a class A-size space "just in case", big users would be
willing to request another 256 when the new branch office opens
Wasn't one of the design goals of IPv6 to make renumbering easier, so that
people could move from small assignments to large ones?
--
/================================================================\
|John Stracke | http://www.ecal.com |My opinions are my own. |
|Chief Scientist |===============================================|
|eCal Corp. |The cheapest, fastest, most reliable components|
|francis(_at_)ecal(_dot_)com|of a computer system are those that aren't |
| |there.--Gordon Bell |
\================================================================/