Re: NAT->IPv6

It's also completely naive that source routing is your only threat.  One
can break into a NAT.  One can forge packets and address them
appropriately.  Firewalls prevent this, not NATs.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: NAT->IPv6, J. Noel Chiappa Re: NAT->IPv6, John Stracke Re: NAT->IPv6, Leonid Yegoshin Re: NAT->IPv6, Leonid Yegoshin Re: NAT->IPv6, Eliot Lear Re: NAT->IPv6, Steven M. Bellovin Re: NAT->IPv6, Leonid Yegoshin Re: NAT->IPv6, Greg Hudson Re: NAT->IPv6, Vernon Schryver Re: NAT->IPv6, Eliot Lear <= Re: NAT->IPv6, Vernon Schryver Re: NAT->IPv6, Leonid Yegoshin

Previous by Date:	RE: runumbering (was: Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated?), ned . freed
Next by Date:	Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt, Tim Salo
Previous by Thread:	Re: NAT->IPv6, Vernon Schryver
Next by Thread:	Re: NAT->IPv6, Vernon Schryver
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]