Re: The Non-IETF Informational RFC Publication Fiction

ietf

2000-06-27 23:00:02

At 16.38 +0000 00-06-27, Mohsen BANAN-Public wrote:

I believe I also played a significant role in
establishing the RFC Editor's independence based on my insistence on
doing it by the book.


Not at all.

You did not change or play any specific role at all.

The standard mechanism was used.

   paf

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: The Non-IETF Informational RFC Publication Fiction, (continued) Re: The Non-IETF Informational RFC Publication Fiction, Mike Blackstock Re: The Non-IETF Informational RFC Publication Fiction, Bob Braden Re: The Non-IETF Informational RFC Publication Fiction, Mohsen BANAN-Public Re: The Non-IETF Informational RFC Publication Fiction, Tim Salo Re: The Non-IETF Informational RFC Publication Fiction, Keith Moore Re: The Non-IETF Informational RFC Publication Fiction, Bill Manning Re: The Non-IETF Informational RFC Publication Fiction, Keith Moore Re: The Non-IETF Informational RFC Publication Fiction, Henning Schulzrinne SIP Info vs re-invite, Yixin Zhu RE: SIP Info vs re-invite, Yixin Zhu Re: The Non-IETF Informational RFC Publication Fiction, Patrik Fältström <= Re: The Non-IETF Informational RFC Publication Fiction, Vernon Schryver

Previous by Date:	Re: Firewall System, Garreth Jeremiah
Next by Date:	RE: WAP and IP, Dan Kohn
Previous by Thread:	RE: SIP Info vs re-invite, Yixin Zhu
Next by Thread:	Re: The Non-IETF Informational RFC Publication Fiction, Vernon Schryver
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]