IETF Discussion (date)
June 30, 2000
- Fault Tolerant in Active Network, Sam . Ng, 20:10
- Re: WAP - What A Problem..., Renfield Kuroda, 18:20
- Re: Is WAP mobile Internet??, Renfield Kuroda, 18:10
- FAQ: The IETF+Censored list, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 16:20
- Re: RFC 2862 on RTP Payload Format for Real-Time Pointers, Robert G. Ferrell, 11:40
- Re: WAP - What A Problem..., Jim_Stephenson-Dunn, 11:30
- Re: WAP - What A Problem..., Valdis . Kletnieks, 11:00
- Re: WAP - What A Problem..., Anthony Atkielski, 10:20
- Re: WAP - What A Problem..., Jon Crowcroft, 09:30
- Re: WAP - What A Problem..., Alan Simpkins, 08:30
- Re: WAP - What A Problem..., Valdis . Kletnieks, 07:40
- Re: Is WAP mobile Internet??, Patrik Fältström, 05:50
- RE: Is WAP mobile Internet??, Parkinson, Jonathan, 05:30
- Re: Speakers - WAP CONVENTION - The European Event, Jon Knight, 05:20
- Is WAP mobile Internet??, Lars-Erik Jonsson, 05:00
- Speakers - WAP CONVENTION - The European Event, Rosie Drugeault, 03:19
June 29, 2000
- RE: WAP - What A Problem..., Erkki Kolehmainen, 22:50
- Re: WAP - What A Problem..., Eric Brunner, 19:00
- Possible mix-up in hotel assignment for Pittsburgh IETF, Ken Hornstein, 16:50
- Re: WAP - What A Problem..., Anthony Atkielski, 16:00
- Re: WAP - What A Problem..., Anthony Atkielski, 15:50
- Re: IETF Wireless LAN history, Joe Touch, 15:40
- Re: IETF Wireless LAN history, RJ Atkinson, 15:30
- Re: WAP - What A Problem..., Robert Elz, 14:40
- Re: IETF Wireless LAN history, Joe Touch, 13:20
- Re: IETF Wireless LAN history, Robert G. Ferrell, 13:00
- Re: IETF Wireless LAN history, Phil Neumiller, 12:50
- RE: WAP - What A Problem..., Brijesh Kumar, 12:40
- Re: IETF Wireless LAN history, Valdis . Kletnieks, 12:30
- Re: IETF Wireless LAN history, John Stracke, 12:20
- Re: WAP - What A Problem..., John Stracke, 12:10
- Re: IETF Wireless LAN history, Theodore Y. Ts'o, 12:00
- Re: IETF Wireless LAN history, Angelos D. Keromytis, 11:50
- RE: IETF Wireless LAN history, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 11:40
- RE: IETF Wireless LAN history, Randy Bush, 11:30
- RE: IETF Wireless LAN history, Christian Huitema, 11:20
- Re: WAP - What A Problem..., Alan Simpkins, 11:10
- Re: WAP - What A Problem..., John Stracke, 10:50
- RE: IETF Wireless LAN history, RJ Atkinson, 10:40
- Re: WAP - What A Problem..., John Stracke, 10:30
- Re: WAP - What A Problem..., Gilbert Cattoire, 10:20
- RE: Bluetooth, Gilbert Cattoire, 10:10
- RE: Bluetooth, Parkinson, Jonathan, 10:00
- Re: WAP - What A Problem..., Alan Simpkins, 09:50
- Re: WAP - What A Problem..., Anthony Atkielski, 09:30
- Re: Bluetooth, Joe Touch, 09:00
- RE: Bluetooth, Taylor, Johnny, 08:30
- RE: Bluetooth, Randy Bush, 07:40
- RE: Bluetooth, Scot Mc Pherson, 07:30
- RE: Bluetooth, Randy Bush, 07:20
- RE: Bluetooth, Dan Kohn, 07:10
- Re: WAP - What A Problem..., Jon Crowcroft, 00:20
June 28, 2000
- RE: Linux OS, Manoj Shrivastava, 11:00
- Re: Bluetooth is a flaucipaucinihilipilification..., Randy Bush, 09:50
- Re: Bluetooth is a flaucipaucinihilipilification..., Jon Crowcroft, 09:10
- Linux OS, Ventura, Tony, 08:50
- Bluetooth, Parkinson, Jonathan, 07:20
- NOCC Specifications, Alen Kirkorian, 06:30
- NOCC Specifications, Alen Kirkorian, 06:20
- Re: WAP and IP, Frank Kastenholz, 05:50
- re:wap is a trap - reject wap, Renfield Kuroda, 05:00
- MPLS conference, Ann Pendleton, 03:40
- Re: ESRO (RE: WAP and IP), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 03:20
June 27, 2000
- RE: WAP and IP, Dan Kohn, 23:10
- Re: The Non-IETF Informational RFC Publication Fiction, Patrik Fältström, 23:00
- Re: Firewall System, Garreth Jeremiah, 22:40
- MAC Address., Sriram Shanmugam, 21:40
- Re: The Non-IETF Informational RFC Publication Fiction, Henning Schulzrinne, 21:30
- Joining IETF, Telecom Regulatory Commission of Sri Lanka, 20:50
- Re: IEPG Meeting - IP Addressing, narakamath, 18:40
- RE: SIP Info vs re-invite, Yixin Zhu, 14:30
- Re: The Non-IETF Informational RFC Publication Fiction, Vernon Schryver, 13:50
- SIP Info vs re-invite, Yixin Zhu, 13:40
- Re: The Non-IETF Informational RFC Publication Fiction, Keith Moore, 13:10
- Re: The Non-IETF Informational RFC Publication Fiction, Bill Manning, 12:50
- Re: The Non-IETF Informational RFC Publication Fiction, Mike Blackstock, 12:10
- Re: The Non-IETF Informational RFC Publication Fiction, Keith Moore, 11:30
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP), Taylor, Johnny, 11:10
- Re: The Non-IETF Informational RFC Publication Fiction, Tim Salo, 10:30
- Re: The Non-IETF Informational RFC Publication Fiction, Mohsen BANAN-Public, 09:40
- Re: IEPG Meeting - IP Addressing, Brian E Carpenter, 09:20
- Re: The Non-IETF Informational RFC Publication Fiction, Bob Braden, 09:10
- Re: WAP and IP, Randy Bush, 09:00
- Re: The Non-IETF Informational RFC Publication Fiction, Valdis . Kletnieks, 08:50
- Re: RTSP vs RTCP & Layered encoding with multi-RTP channels, Henning Schulzrinne, 08:40
- Now: A Lesser IESG Is A Better IETF -- Was: RE: WAP and IP, Mohsen BANAN-Public, 08:30
- The Non-IETF Informational RFC Publication Fiction, Mohsen BANAN-Public, 08:20
- RTSP vs RTCP & Layered encoding with multi-RTP channels, Nikki Cranley, 08:10
- Re: ESRO (RE: WAP and IP), Mohsen BANAN-Public, 08:00
- Re: Firewall System, Valdis . Kletnieks, 06:50
- Re: WAP and IP, Marcus Leech, 05:50
- Firewall System, Don Balunos, 04:50
- SONET MIB Standards?, Shivendra Kumar, 02:30
June 26, 2000
- RE: WAP and IP, RJ Atkinson, 20:10
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP), Dan Kohn, 17:00
- RE: WAP and IP, Vernon Schryver, 12:30
- RE: WAP and IP, Brijesh Kumar, 11:30
- Re: IEPG Meeting - IP Addressing, Valdis . Kletnieks, 08:40
- Address Book Problem...., Sunil Chinjwani, 06:40
- Re: Seeking Open Mobile Messaging Protocols -- Efficient E-Mail, Keith Moore, 06:20
- Re: Seeking Open Mobile Messaging Protocols -- Efficient E-Mail, Randy Bush, 06:10
- Re: Anycast and related frobs, Magnus Danielson, 02:30
- Anycast and related frobs, Tripp Lilley, 00:50
June 25, 2000
- ESRO (RE: WAP and IP), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 23:30
- RE: WAP and IP, Patrik Fältström, 23:10
- LEAPing Over WAP, Mohsen BANAN-Public, 23:05
- Seeking Open Mobile Messaging Protocols -- Efficient E-Mail, Mohsen BANAN-Public, 22:50
- RE: WAP and IP, Mohsen BANAN-Public, 22:40
- Re: XML as disruption, Simon St.Laurent, 09:10
- Re: IEPG Meeting - IP Addressing, narakamath, 08:10
- Re: XML as disruption, Simon St.Laurent, 06:20
- Re: XML as disruption, Eric Brunner, 06:10
June 24, 2000
- IEPG Meeting, Philip J. Nesser II, 23:00
- Re: WAP and IP, Mark Atwood, 21:00
- XML as disruption, Simon St.Laurent, 19:40
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP), Bob Wise, 19:30
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP), Bob Wise, 19:20
- Re: Where is the OID "dot convention" spelled out?, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 13:40
- RE: WAP and IP, Patrik Fältström, 00:00
June 23, 2000
- RE: WAP and IP, Vernon Schryver, 19:10
- RE: WAP and IP, Mohsen BANAN-Public, 17:40
- RE: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP, Brijesh Kumar, 15:30
- SNMP Mib agent development, Gateway55, 15:10
- RE: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP, Mohsen BANAN-Public, 14:20
- RE: Where is the OID "dot convention" spelled out?, Daryl Bunce, 13:10
- Re: Where is the OID "dot convention" spelled out?, Kurt D. Zeilenga, 12:20
- Please help share your 802.11 multivendor interop experience, Lenny Foner, 11:40
- DoubleTree Cancellations, Hollenbeck, Scott, 06:40
June 22, 2000
- RE: Where is the OID "dot convention" spelled out?, TSIGARIDAS PANAGIOTIS, 23:46
- RE: WAP and IP, Ashish Sood, 22:30
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP), Mahadevan Iyer, 21:50
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP), Masataka Ohta, 19:50
- RE: Where is the OID "dot convention" spelled out?, Christian Huitema, 18:10
- RE: Where is the OID "dot convention" spelled out?, Peter Furniss, 16:30
- RE: WAP and IP, Vernon Schryver, 16:20
- RE: WAP and IP, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 15:30
- Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP, Mohsen BANAN-Public, 12:50
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP), Lee John-W15376, 12:30
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP), Brijesh Kumar, 12:20
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP), Chuck Kaekel, 11:20
- Common Radio Access Protocol Set (CRAPS) BOF, pcalhoun(_at_)eng(_dot_)sun(_dot_)com, 11:00
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP), Eric Brunner, 09:30
- Re: IP over MIME, Robert G. Ferrell, 09:20
- RE: WAP and IP, Brijesh Kumar, 08:40
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP), Matt Crawford, 08:00
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP), Magnus Danielson, 07:00
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP), John Stracke, 06:10
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP), Magnus Danielson, 05:50
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP), Patrik Fältström, 05:10
- Where is the OID "dot convention" spelled out?, Michael Mealling, 04:50
June 21, 2000
- Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP, Masataka Ohta, 22:50
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP), Patrik Fältström, 22:30
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP), Randy Bush, 18:40
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP), Bill Manning, 18:30
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP), Steve Deering, 17:10
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP), Mark Atwood, 16:10
- Re: Free Protocols Foundation Policies and Procedures -- Request For Review, Jon Crowcroft, 14:40
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP), Keith Moore, 14:30
- WAP and IP, Mark Baker, 14:10
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP), John Stracke, 13:50
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP), Brijesh Kumar, 13:20
- Free Protocols Foundation Policies and Procedures -- Request For Review, Mohsen BANAN-Public, 12:04
- Re: idea for Free Protocols Foundation, Mohsen BANAN-Public, 11:50
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP), Keith Moore, 11:20
- Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP, Dennis Glatting, 10:50
- Freedom of Speech (was fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam E-Mail ), Jim_Stephenson-Dunn, 10:40
- idea for Free Protocols Foundation, James P. Salsman, 10:30
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP), Parkinson, Jonathan, 09:30
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP), Taylor, Johnny, 09:00
- RE: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP, Brijesh Kumar, 08:10
- Re: Port Help ?, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd, 07:00
- Re: Port Help ?, Kimon A. Andreou, 06:50
- Port Help ?, Parkinson, Jonathan, 06:30
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP), Magnus Danielson, 05:40
- IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP), Donald E. Eastlake 3rd, 04:30
- SNMP v1, v2, v3 are they compatible?, TANIA PAULSE, 02:00
- Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP, Magnus Danielson, 01:50
June 20, 2000
- Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP, Keith Moore, 21:30
- Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP, Mohsen BANAN-Public, 21:20
- RE: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP, Mohsen BANAN-Public, 21:00
- Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP, Sean Doran, 18:40
- Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP, Keith Moore, 18:30
- BoF on new IPv4 address allocation policy in INET'2000, Masataka Ohta, 17:40
- Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP, Masataka Ohta, 17:30
- Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP, John Stracke, 14:30
- Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP, John Stracke, 14:10
- Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP, Masataka Ohta, 14:00
- Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP, Phil Karn, 13:30
- Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP, Masataka Ohta, 13:10
- Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP, Phil Karn, 12:40
- Re: Best Toner Cartridge Prices Ever, Mike Truskowski, 09:00
- Re: Best Toner Cartridge Prices Ever, Robert G. Ferrell, 08:40
- RE: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam E-Mail, Robert G. Ferrell, 08:20
- Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP, John Stracke, 08:10
- RE: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP, Brijesh Kumar, 07:30
- Re: Best Toner Cartridge Prices Ever, Yaya A. Abatan, 03:00
June 19, 2000
- WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP, Mohsen BANAN-Public, 23:53
- RE: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam E-Mail, James Wilson, 23:00
- please remove APNIC from the IETF list, Vernon Schryver, 17:20
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam E-Mail, Vernon Schryver, 16:30
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam E-Mail, Mark Atwood, 15:30
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam E-Mail, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd, 14:00
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam E-Mail, Matt Crawford, 13:10
- Best Toner Cartridge Prices Ever, 9876sdgpo09, 12:50
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam E-Mail, Keith Moore, 12:30
- RE: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam E-Mail, Dennis Glatting, 11:10
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam E-Mail, Mike Truskowski, 10:40
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam E-Mail, Fred Baker, 10:10
- RE: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam E-Mail, Book, Robert, 10:00
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam E-Mail, Randall . Gale, 09:00
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam E-Mail, Robert G. Ferrell, 08:40
- Request to Join, Betty or Larry Lorenz, 07:50
- The DDoS problem... handled wrong by the governments?, tkuiper, 01:40
June 16, 2000
- mail test, 고종하, 22:20
- Re: What is -30- ?, Jay Holt, 20:00
- No Subject, Mmagain2, 19:30
- Re: Do we have a formal way to send a one-line 'email' which is it's own subject? <eom>, Mohsen BANAN-Public, 18:10
- Re: What is -30- ?, Randy Bush, 18:00
- Re: Re[1]: Do we have a formal way to send a one-line 'email' which is it's own subject?, Randy Bush, 16:00
- Re[1]: Do we have a formal way to send a one-line 'email' which is it's own subject?, Danny Cohen, 15:40
- RE: Universal Mobile Telecommunication Service (UMTS), Shaw, Robert, 14:20
- Re: Do we have a formal way to send a one-line 'email' which is it's own subject? <eom>, Valdis . Kletnieks, 12:30
- Antigen found HLL.cmp.41732.swp virus, ANTIGEN_UMKC-MAIL01, 12:20
- Do we have a formal way to send a one-line 'email' which is it's own subject? <eom>, Dave Miller, 12:00
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam E-Mail, Jeffrey Altman, 11:20
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam E-Mail, Keith Moore, 11:10
- Re: CAUCE and DMA, Kurt Weber, 11:00
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam E-Mail, Chip Rosenthal, 10:20
- CAUCE and DMA, Keith Moore, 09:20
- Re: Suggest a good email server pls, Valdis . Kletnieks, 09:00
- RE: Universal Mobile Telecommunication Service (UMTS), Erkki Kolehmainen, 08:40
- RE: Suggest a good email server pls, R.Ilker Gokhan, 08:30
- Universal Mobile Telecommunication Service (UMTS), Parkinson, Jonathan, 08:20
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam E-Mail, Valdis . Kletnieks, 08:10
- RE: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam E-Mail, Dawson, Peter D, 07:30
- RE: Suggest a good email server pls, Hallgren, Michael, 07:00
- Re: Suggest a good email server pls, Valdis . Kletnieks, 06:50
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam E-Mail, Lillian Komlossy, 06:30
- RE: Suggest a good email server pls, R.Ilker Gokhan, 04:40
June 15, 2000
- Suggest a good email server pls, Faheem Ahmed Khan, 23:20
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam E-Mail, Keith Moore, 19:10
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam E-Mail, Eric Brunner, 19:00
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam E-Mail, Keith Moore, 18:50
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam E-Mail, Keith Moore, 18:40
- RE: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam E-Mail, Dan Kohn, 17:00
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam E-Mail, Doug Isenberg, 16:10
- IGP Survey, Danny McPherson, 15:10
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam E-Mail, Kurt Weber, 14:40
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam E-Mail, Keith Moore, 13:40
- Re: Mailing lists, Robert G. Ferrell, 12:50
- Thanks to All, Jon William Toigo, 11:00
- Re: IETF, ITU-T membership, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd, 10:50
- Re: Mailing lists (was Re: IETF, ITU-T membership), Robert Elz, 10:40
- Re: Mailing lists (was Re: IETF, ITU-T membership), Valdis . Kletnieks, 10:30
- RE: Mailing lists (was Re: IETF, ITU-T membership), David A. Higginbotham, 10:20
- RE: Mailing lists (was Re: IETF, ITU-T membership), Maddux, Michel, 10:10
- fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam E-Mail, Lillian Komlossy, 10:00
- ASTA: Nike Air 180 a 1000 £....., Oliviero Abbigliamento, 09:50
- Mailing lists (was Re: IETF, ITU-T membership), Valdis . Kletnieks, 09:40
- pollem, Dawson, Peter D, 09:30
- RE: CCIE, Parkinson, Jonathan, 09:20
- Re: IETF, ITU-T membership, Pankaj K Jha, 09:10
- RE: IETF, ITU-T membership, Shaw, Robert, 08:50
- Re: CCIE, Kurt Weber, 08:40
- Re: IETF, ITU-T membership, narakamath, 08:30
- Re: IETF, ITU-T membership, Dhaval Shah, 08:10
- Re: IETF, ITU-T membership, Pete Resnick, 08:00
- RE: CCIE - I still don't know, Brian . Rubarts, 07:50
- Re: IETF, ITU-T membership, Valdis . Kletnieks, 07:30
- Re: IETF, ITU-T membership, Mark Atwood, 07:20
- IETF, ITU-T membership, Yixin Zhu, 07:00
June 14, 2000
- RE: CCIE - I still don't know, Randy Bush, 20:20
- Re: CCIE, Kurt Weber, 20:10
- Re: CCIE, Murali K Viswanathan, 16:20
- Re: CCIE - I still don't know, Jeff . Hodges, 14:50
- RE: CCIE - I still don't know, Shen, Peter, 14:30
- Re: CCIE - I still don't know, Betsy Brennan, 14:10
- Re: CCIE, Kevin Lahey, 12:50
- Re: CCIE, Kevin Lahey, 12:46
- Re: CCIE, Eric Brunner, 11:30
- RE: CCIE, Lillian Komlossy, 11:10
- Re: CCIE, Nuno Cristelo, 10:30
- RE: CCIE, Maddux, Michel, 10:20
- RE: CCIE, Michael B. Bellopede, 10:00
- Re: CCIE, John Stracke, 09:50
- RE: CCIE, David A. Higginbotham, 09:30
- Re: CCIE, Valdis . Kletnieks, 09:20
- Re: CCIE, Randy Bush, 09:00
- RE: CCIE, Michael B. Bellopede, 08:00
- AW: CCIE, Feigel Reinhold (MC-AC/WES1), 07:20
- CCIE, mark.paton, 06:30
June 12, 2000
- RE: remove me from list, Dawson, Peter D, 14:00
- RE: "Big 5" Company SPAMMING, Scot Mc Pherson, 13:20
- Re: remove me from list, Robert G. Ferrell, 13:10
- RE: "Big 5" Company SPAMMING, Dawson, Peter D, 13:00
- Re: "Big 5" Company SPAMMING, Kurt Weber, 12:40
- RE: "Big 5" Company SPAMMING, Scot Mc Pherson, 12:30
- Re: "Big 5" Company SPAMMING, Betsy Brennan, 12:10
- Re: remove me from list, Kurt Weber, 11:10
- Re: remove me from list, Valdis . Kletnieks, 11:00
- Re: remove me from list, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd, 10:10
- "Big 5" Company Nationwide: B-2-B e-Commerce Consultants & Pro grammers/Developers, wfann, 09:00
- Re: remove me from list, Valdis . Kletnieks, 08:20
- RE: NAT Checkpoint Firewall 1, R.Ilker Gokhan, 06:50
- remove me from list, Honey Rand, 04:30
June 07, 2000
- Re: Acronims' ambiquity, Matt Crawford, 15:20
- Re: Acronims' ambiquity, Brian E Carpenter, 14:40
- RE: Acronims' ambiquity, Bob Braden, 14:30
- RE: Acronims' ambiquity, Pete Loshin, 12:50
- RE: Acronims' ambiquity, Bob Braden, 12:40
- RE: Acronims' ambiquity, J. Noel Chiappa, 11:20
- RE: Acronims' ambiquity, Pete Loshin, 11:10
- RE: Acronims' ambiquity, Dawson, Peter D, 10:00
- e-prints, John, 09:00
June 06, 2000
- RE: Acronims' ambiquity, Scott Bradner, 17:10
- RE: Acronims' ambiquity, Dawson, Peter D, 10:40
- RE: Acronims' ambiquity, bindignavile . srinivas, 10:10
- RE: Regarding the pointer field in LSSR options of IP packet., Dawson, Peter D, 09:50
- Re: Acronims' ambiquity, Salvador Vidal, 09:40
- Re: Regarding the pointer field in LSSR options of IP packet., Bob Braden, 08:50
- APIs for web servers, Barathy, RamaSubramaniam, 07:00
- Re: Regarding the pointer field in LSSR options of IP packet., C. M. Heard, 00:20
June 02, 2000
- Sigcomm 2000 - call for participation of IETF members, Joe Touch, 14:40
- RE: Security and suffixes (Re: Cite on DNS-related traffic.), Scot Mc Pherson, 13:50
- Re: Security and suffixes (Re: Cite on DNS-related traffic.), Bob Braden, 13:30
- Re: Security and suffixes (Re: Cite on DNS-related traffic.), Joe Touch, 13:20
- Re: Security and suffixes (Re: Cite on DNS-related traffic.), John C Klensin, 12:50
- Re: Security and suffixes (Re: Cite on DNS-related traffic.), Keith Moore, 12:10
- Re: BGP4, Eliot Lear, 11:30
- Re: Security and suffixes (Re: Cite on DNS-related traffic.), Joe Touch, 11:10
- RE: RFCs in print, Michael B. Bellopede, 10:50
- Re: RFCs in print, Robert G. Ferrell, 10:10
- Re: BGP4, HUGO ZAMORA LOPEZ, 08:50
- Re: BGP4, John Cappiello, 08:10
June 01, 2000
- Identification of Topology..?, Sriram Shanmugam, 23:50
- Security and suffixes (Re: Cite on DNS-related traffic.), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 23:40
- Re: RFCs in print, R. Muralidharan, 23:00
- BGP4, knarayan, 22:50
- Re: RFCs in print, Keith Moore, 19:20
- RFCs in print, Pete Loshin, 17:30
- private please for IETF members, Sudanet - Wad Medani, 16:00
- please join this site, Imperial Cyber Cafe', 15:50
- TFTP Extensions movement to full Standard, Gary Malkin, 12:00
- RE: Cite on DNS-related traffic., sthaug, 11:10
- RE: Cite on DNS-related traffic., Rick H Wesson, 09:30
- Re: Acronims' ambiquity, Pete Loshin, 08:20
- Re: Acronims' ambiquity, Greg Hudson, 07:10
- Re: New OBAST mailing list, Randall Stewart, 05:40
- IETF List maintenance, The IETF Secretariat, 04:20
- Acronims' ambiquity, salavat, 04:10