Scott,
->-----Original Message-----
->From: Scott Bradner [mailto:sob(_at_)harvard(_dot_)edu]
->Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2000 8:04 PM
->To: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
->Subject: RE: Acronims' ambiquity
->
->
->
->> the IETF's RFC/BCP's etc etc are the property of ISOC.
->
->this is more than a bit simplistic
->
->the ISOC holds a copyright license on RFCs that permit them to be
->published and freely copied and, in most cases, the right for
->derivative
->works within the IETF standards process - the authoirs retain
->all other
->rights including the basic copyright
->
->Scott
->
This is interesting... a couple of weeks ago
I remember a thread of Pete Loshin's saying
something about a 10 series release of various RFC's.
does this imply (if I understand you correctly)
that royalty payments (on such publications)
are made to both Authors/ISOC ??
Pete, <or anyone>, clarifications/ comment's please.
/pd