RE: Acronims' ambiquity

the IETF's RFC/BCP's etc etc are the property of ISOC.


this is more than a bit simplistic

the ISOC holds a copyright license on RFCs that permit them to be
published and freely copied and, in most cases, the right for derivative
works within the IETF standards process - the authoirs retain all other
rights including the basic copyright

Scott

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Acronims' ambiquity, salavat Re: Acronims' ambiquity, Greg Hudson Re: Acronims' ambiquity, Pete Loshin Re: Acronims' ambiquity, Salvador Vidal RE: Acronims' ambiquity, bindignavile . srinivas RE: Acronims' ambiquity, Dawson, Peter D RE: Acronims' ambiquity, Scott Bradner <= RE: Acronims' ambiquity, Dawson, Peter D RE: Acronims' ambiquity, Pete Loshin Message not available RE: Acronims' ambiquity, Pete Loshin RE: Acronims' ambiquity, J. Noel Chiappa RE: Acronims' ambiquity, Bob Braden RE: Acronims' ambiquity, Bob Braden Re: Acronims' ambiquity, Matt Crawford Re: Acronims' ambiquity, Brian E Carpenter Re: Acronims' ambiquity, Joe Touch Re: Acronims' ambiquity, Brian E Carpenter

Previous by Date:	RE: Acronims' ambiquity, Dawson, Peter D
Next by Date:	e-prints, John
Previous by Thread:	RE: Acronims' ambiquity, Dawson, Peter D
Next by Thread:	RE: Acronims' ambiquity, Dawson, Peter D
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]