This I can agree with, the next question that
naturally follows then is is WAP the right protocol
for a fixed wireless application, or are we talking
about yet another set of standards and protocols. I
would tend to
think that one set should work for both.
Regards, Alan
--- John Stracke <francis(_at_)ecal(_dot_)com> wrote:
Alan Simpkins wrote:
For some countries it
is more feasible for people to use mobile
technology
But better still is fixed-wireless, which can
deliver bandwidth
more cheaply, because you have more predictable
signal
conditions. Unless you're talking about nomadic
headers getting
online out in the Sahara--in which case, development
money would
be better spent on, say, reforestation.
--
/=================================================================\
|John Stracke | http://www.ecal.com |My opinions
are my own. |
|Chief Scientist
|================================================|
|eCal Corp. |"How quietly do you think we can
nail these back|
|francis(_at_)ecal(_dot_)com|in?" --Calvin
|
\=================================================================/
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/