Re: An Internet Draft as reference material
2000-09-22 15:50:03
Tim,
The April fool's day RFCs aside, I agree that not all I-Ds that fail
to make the cut as an RFC are inferior. However, there are many other
venues for publishing technical material, many of which subject the
material to review. An I-D that contains good material but fails to
become an RFC has other ways to become archival, cite-able, etc.
Steve
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material, (continued)
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material, Joe Touch
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material, Tim Salo
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material, Joe Touch
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material, Joe Touch
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material, Tim Salo
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material, Joe Touch
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material, Tim Salo
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material,
Stephen Kent <=
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material, Dave Crocker
RE: An Internet Draft as reference material, Kay, Rodney
Re: An Internet Draft as reference material, Scott Bradner
Re: An Internet Draft as reference material, Mark Allman
|
|
|