--On Thursday, 28 September, 2000 12:02 -0700 Eliot Lear
<lear(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com> wrote:
John,
I would accept your interpretation if you can go to a major
search engine, like Yahoo or Altavista, and find me in a brief
period of time ANY version of Mike O'Dell's 8+8 proposal.
Don't you think it shameful that there is no permanent record
about a serious effort to deal with a serious problem
(multihoming)? And this is a recent (read: current) problem!
Eliot,
I agree with Bob Braden's identification of this particular
document's slipping through the cracks as "shameful" and hope we
can fix it. But, if one looks at the bottom line, Mike
essentially chose to let it expire, and no one else chose to pick
it up and push for RFC publication. The shame lies there, not in
issues with the I-D expiration/ archiving process.
john