Re: NATs *ARE* evil!

    > From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry(_at_)piermont(_dot_)com>

    > you're ideologically opposed to deploying v6 instead of against it for
    > technical reasons?

Ah, *that's* what's wrong with IPv6 - it doesn't pay enough attention to
control of the means of production by the workers.

And here I was, all these years, thinking there were all these technical
things wrong with IPv6. Oh well, I guess I wasn't very perceptive.

        Noel

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
*RE: NATs ARE* evil!*, (continued)* *RE: NATs ARE* evil!*, Chris Millikin* *RE: NATs ARE* evil!*, David Higginbotham* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, J. Noel Chiappa* *RE: NATs ARE* evil!*, Chris Millikin* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Kevin Farley* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Scott Bradner* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Paul Ferguson* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Keith Moore* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Michael Richardson* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Keith Moore* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, J. Noel Chiappa* <= *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Perry E. Metzger* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Sean Doran* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Keith Moore* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Perry E. Metzger* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Sean Doran* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Jon Crowcroft* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Keith Moore* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Perry E. Metzger* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, RJ Atkinson* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Jon Crowcroft*

Previous by Date:	*Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Perry E. Metzger*
Next by Date:	*Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Sean Doran*
Previous by Thread:	*Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Keith Moore*
Next by Thread:	*Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Perry E. Metzger*
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]