Re: NATs *ARE* evil!

to make v6 work tarks end users more work than v4


if "v4" includes dealing with an increasingly severe shortage of
address space (which sooner or later implies forced renumbering)
and/or tying together multiple NATted networks, it's not at all 
clear that this takes less work than v6.

Keith

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
*Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, (continued)* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Keith Moore* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Michael Richardson* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Keith Moore* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, J. Noel Chiappa* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Perry E. Metzger* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Sean Doran* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Keith Moore* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Perry E. Metzger* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Sean Doran* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Jon Crowcroft* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Keith Moore* <= *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Perry E. Metzger* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, RJ Atkinson* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Jon Crowcroft* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Theodore Y. Ts'o* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Geoff Huston* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Mike Fisk* *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Theodore Y. Ts'o* levels of end-to-end; lack thereof, Dave Crocker Re: levels of end-to-end; lack thereof, Keith Moore *Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Mike Fisk*

Previous by Date:	Re: What is the IETF? -- A note of caution, Dave Crocker
Next by Date:	*Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, J. Noel Chiappa*
Previous by Thread:	*Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Jon Crowcroft*
Next by Thread:	*Re: NATs ARE* evil!*, Perry E. Metzger*
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]