Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables

> Taking your valuable points a bit further, NAT avoidance arguments aren't
> likely to sell IPv6 to us large end users, because this is a problem for which
> it is difficult to construct a business case that will excite the
> non-technical managers who are in charge of blessing large capital expenses.
this is why some of us are working on solutions for interim deployment
of IPv6 without the need for large capital expenses; i.e. at a similar
cost to deployment of NAT.

Keith