ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard

2001-09-10 08:10:03
At 05:42 AM 9/10/2001, Lloyd Wood wrote:
As reference (1) indicates, SOAP is documented in the W3C. Why is this
work being done as an IETF draft and not in the W3C? BEEP is RFC3080,
but SOAP in BEEP is a SOAP-specific problem, which afaik means it's a
W3C problem.

Ethernet is not an IETF specification, yet the IETF has an IP-over-Ethernet standard.

The simple fact is that "convergence" layer protocols, that allow one protocol to work on top of another, are separate specification efforts from either of the protocols being converged. It is not automatically better to have the "top" or the "bottom" layer originating standards group do the convergence protocol.

My own view is that the IETF has very strong skills at doing protocols and the W3C is strong at doing formats (content). That suggests doing the convergence protocol in the IETF.

In any event, the specification has been written. Are there any TECHNICAL problems with it?

d/


----------
Dave Crocker  <mailto:dcrocker(_at_)brandenburg(_dot_)com>
Brandenburg InternetWorking  <http://www.brandenburg.com>
tel +1.408.246.8253;  fax +1.408.273.6464



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>