Bandwidth? BANDWIDTH. We don't need no stinking bandwidth

ietf

2002-01-21 16:10:02


Of course its true: "no amount of QOS can generate any additional bandwidth" 


(That's what Multi Protocol Labeling Switching is for!)

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Bandwidth? BANDWIDTH. We don't need no stinking bandwidth, Dan Kolis <= Syntax... Re: Bandwidth? BANDWIDTH. We don't need no stinking bandwidth, grenville armitage Re: Syntax... Re: Bandwidth? BANDWIDTH. We don't need no stinking bandwidth, Christopher Evans Re: Bandwidth? BANDWIDTH. We don't need no stinking bandwidth, Lixia Zhang

Previous by Date:	Re: Plenaries at IETF 53, Stephen Casner
Next by Date:	Syntax... Re: Bandwidth? BANDWIDTH. We don't need no stinking bandwidth, grenville armitage
Previous by Thread:	Re: Last Call: Message Disposition Notification to Draft Standard, Graham Klyne
Next by Thread:	Syntax... Re: Bandwidth? BANDWIDTH. We don't need no stinking bandwidth, grenville armitage
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]