IETF Discussion (date)
January 31, 2002
- Re: OK... we thought we were running out of IPv4 address space*before*.., Steven M. Bellovin, 13:40
- Re: OK... we thought we were running out of IPv4 address space*before*.., Meritt James, 12:40
- Re: OK... we thought we were running out of IPv4 address space *before*.., Jasen Strutt, 11:50
- Re: Why does Valdis trust UL?, Mark Adam, 11:40
- Re: OK... we thought we were running out of IPv4 address space *before*.., Christopher Evans, 11:10
January 30, 2002
- Re: OK... we thought we were running out of IPv4 address space *before*.., Frank Solensky, 12:50
- Re: OK... we thought we were running out of IPv4 address space *before*.., Keith Moore, 10:40
- Re: OK... we thought we were running out of IPv4 address space *before*.., Ari Ollikainen, 10:10
- OK... we thought we were running out of IPv4 address space *before*.., Valdis . Kletnieks, 08:30
- Re: Why does Valdis trust UL?, Tony Dal Santo, 07:40
January 27, 2002
- Re: Yes, conformance testing required... Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Valdis . Kletnieks, 20:50
- Re: Yes, conformance testing required... Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Peter Deutsch, 19:50
- Re: Yes, conformance testing required... Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Kyle Lussier, 18:10
- Re: Yes, conformance testing required... Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Kyle Lussier, 18:00
- Re: Yes, conformance testing required... Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, grenville armitage, 17:00
- Re: Yes, conformance testing required... Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Kyle Lussier, 03:20
- Re: Yes, conformance testing required... Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Franck Martin, 03:10
- Re: Yes, conformance testing required... Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Kyle Lussier, 02:10
- Re: Yes, conformance testing required... Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Kyle Lussier, 02:00
- Re: Yes, conformance testing required... Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Kyle Lussier, 01:50
- Re: Yes, conformance testing required... Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Kyle Lussier, 00:20
January 26, 2002
- Yes, conformance testing required... Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, grenville armitage, 22:30
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Valdis . Kletnieks, 20:20
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Kyle Lussier, 19:20
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Bob Braden, 18:40
- SIP for Network Gaming...., Meera G.B, 03:40
January 25, 2002
- Re: REMINDER: revision to RFC2727 - NOMCOM, James M Galvin, 13:50
- RE: What is at stake?, Tony Hain, 13:39
- Re: Revision to RFC2727 - NOMCOM, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine, 13:20
- Re: REMINDER: revision to RFC2727 - NOMCOM, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 11:40
- Re: REMINDER: revision to RFC2727 - NOMCOM, Dave Crocker, 10:10
- REMINDER: revision to RFC2727 - NOMCOM, James M Galvin, 10:00
- Re: What is at stake?, Einar Stefferud, 06:51
January 24, 2002
- Perceptions... Re: What is at stake?, grenville armitage, 16:30
- Re: What is at stake?, Ed Gerck, 15:20
- Re: What is at stake?, Keith Moore, 15:10
- Re: What is at stake?, Ed Gerck, 14:50
- No debate-Solutions? IAB/ISOC Sponsorship? Re: off-list, Re: IAB/ISOC not IETF Charter Re: What isat stake?, Camile Howe, 14:40
- Re: What is at stake?, Dave Crocker, 13:30
- Re: What is at stake?, Ed Gerck, 13:10
- Re: off-list, Re: IAB/ISOC not IETF Charter Re: What isat stake? Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, John C Klensin, 13:00
- Re: of control and frogs, Re: What is at stake?, vint cerf, 12:50
- Re: off-list, Re: IAB/ISOC not IETF Charter Re: What isat stake? Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Ed Gerck, 12:40
- RE: What is at stake?, Julia Finnegan, 12:30
- Re: What is at stake?, Michael StJohns, 12:20
- Re: What is at stake?, John W Noerenberg II, 12:00
- RE: What is at stake?, Dave Crocker, 11:20
- Re: of control and frogs, Re: What is at stake?, Vernon Schryver, 11:10
- Re: off-list, Re: IAB/ISOC not IETF Charter Re: What is at stake? Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, John C Klensin, 11:08
- Re: What is at stake?, Bill Manning, 10:50
- RE: What is at stake?, Christian Huitema, 10:40
- Re: What is at stake?, Tony Hansen, 10:30
- Bagged cats and DNS elfs, Dan Kolis, 10:10
- Re: What is at stake?, Dave Crocker, 09:50
- Re: of control and frogs, Re: What is at stake?, Dave Crocker, 09:40
- Re: What is at stake?, vint cerf, 09:30
- Re: What is at stake?, Joel Jaeggli, 09:20
- Re: What is at stake?, Michael Hammer, 09:10
- Re: of control and frogs, Re: What is at stake?, Ed Gerck, 09:00
- of control and frogs, Re: What is at stake?, Ed Gerck, 08:10
- Impossible suggestions, Brian E Carpenter, 07:30
- Re: What is at stake?, Meritt James, 07:20
- Re: What is at stake?, Meritt James, 07:10
- Re: What is at stake?, vint cerf, 07:00
- RE: IAB/ISOC not IETF Charter Re: What is at stake? Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Ramanathan, 06:50
- Revision to RFC2727 - NOMCOM, James M Galvin, 06:30
- Re: What is at stake?, George Michaelson, 06:10
- IAB/ISOC not IETF Charter Re: What is at stake? Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Camile Howe, 02:40
- practical proposal -- Re: What is at stake?, Ed Gerck, 00:10
January 23, 2002
- Re: What is at stake?, Michael StJohns, 23:30
- Re: What is at stake?, George Michaelson, 22:40
- Re: What is at stake?, Valdis . Kletnieks, 22:20
- Re: What is at stake?, Ari Ollikainen, 22:00
- Re: What is at stake?, Ed Gerck, 21:20
- RE: What is at stake?, Franck Martin, 21:10
- Re: What is at stake?, Gary E. Miller, 20:40
- What is at stake?, Ed Gerck, 20:00
- Software Underwriters Lab, Ole J. Jacobsen, 19:10
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Christopher Evans, 18:30
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Keith Moore, 17:00
- Re: how to fail to solve a problem, Keith Moore, 16:40
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Scott Brim, 16:30
- RE: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Franck Martin, 16:10
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Kyle Lussier, 15:30
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Kyle Lussier, 15:20
- RE: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Tony Hain, 15:10
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, John Morris, 15:00
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Vernon Schryver, 14:50
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Valdis . Kletnieks, 14:40
- Re: S/MIME again??, Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Vernon Schryver, 14:30
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd, 14:10
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Kyle Lussier, 14:00
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Peter Deutsch, 13:50
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Kyle Lussier, 13:40
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Kyle Lussier, 13:30
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Kyle Lussier, 13:20
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Marshall T. Rose, 13:10
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Ian Cooper, 13:00
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Getty Verma, 12:50
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Valdis . Kletnieks, 12:40
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Valdis . Kletnieks, 12:30
- Re: how to fail to solve a problem, Ed Gerck, 12:20
- S/MIME again??, Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Ed Gerck, 12:10
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Doug Royer, 12:00
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Keith Moore, 11:50
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Keith Moore, 11:40
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Ed Gerck, 11:30
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Fred Baker, 11:20
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Kyle Lussier, 11:10
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Kyle Lussier, 11:00
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd, 10:50
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Dave Crocker, 10:30
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Valdis . Kletnieks, 10:20
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Henning G. Schulzrinne, 10:10
- putting vendors' feet to the fire, Keith Moore, 10:00
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Alex Audu, 09:50
- RE: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Michel Py, 09:40
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Dave Crocker, 09:30
- how to fail to solve a problem, Keith Moore, 09:20
- Re: FW: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Melinda Shore, 09:10
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Keith Moore, 09:00
- putting vendors' feet to the fire, Keith Moore, 08:50
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Vernon Schryver, 08:40
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Keith Moore, 08:30
- RE: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Davis, Charles, 08:20
- FW: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Ed Mier, 08:10
- RE: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Morgan, Peter (Engineering), 08:00
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Melinda Shore, 07:30
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Marshall T. Rose, 07:20
- RE: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Kyle Lussier, 07:10
- RE: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Franck Martin, 07:00
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, grenville armitage, 06:30
- RE: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Kyle Lussier, 05:30
- RE: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Kyle Lussier, 03:40
- RE: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Mak, L (Leen), 02:50
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Ed Gerck, 01:40
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Randy Bush, 01:20
- RE: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Michel Py, 01:00
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Kyle Lussier, 00:50
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Kyle Lussier, 00:40
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Dave Crocker, 00:30
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Christopher Evans, 00:20
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Kyle Lussier, 00:10
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Dave Crocker, 00:00
January 22, 2002
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Ed Gerck, 23:50
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Kyle Lussier, 23:40
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Kyle Lussier, 23:30
- RE: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Franck Martin, 23:20
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Kyle Lussier, 23:10
- RE: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Kyle Lussier, 22:50
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, grenville armitage, 22:40
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Dave Crocker, 22:30
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Dave Crocker, 22:20
- RE: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Kyle Lussier, 22:10
- RE: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Franck Martin, 21:40
- Re: conformance != enforcement, Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd, 21:30
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Kyle Lussier, 21:10
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd, 20:30
- conformance != enforcement, Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Ed Gerck, 20:00
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Randy Bush, 19:40
- how do we do conformance?, Michael Richardson, 19:30
- Schedule after Yokohama, Yutaka SAKAI, 19:10
- RE: Last Call: Message Disposition Notification to Draft Standard, Vaudreuil, Greg M (Greg), 18:40
- RE: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Kyle Lussier, 18:20
- RE: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Kyle Lussier, 18:10
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Ed Gerck, 17:50
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Einar Stefferud, 17:00
- RE: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Sabharwal, Atul, 16:50
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Einar Stefferud, 16:40
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Einar Stefferud, 16:30
- RE: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Franck Martin, 15:50
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Theodore Tso, 15:30
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Marshall T. Rose, 14:50
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Randy Bush, 14:30
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Valdis . Kletnieks, 12:40
- Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Vernon Schryver, 12:30
- Bandwidth? BANDWIDTH! We do (maybe) need more stinking bandwidth, Dan Kolis, 11:50
- Re: Fwd: Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Einar Stefferud, 11:40
- Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Valdis . Kletnieks, 11:20
- Please note this was NOT from me to the list but was redirected by Stef to the list (a bad practice), David Farber, 07:50
- Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, Randy Bush, 06:50
- IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification, David Farber, 06:30
January 21, 2002
- Re: Bandwidth? BANDWIDTH. We don't need no stinking bandwidth, Lixia Zhang, 22:00
- Bandwidth? BANDWIDTH. We don't need no stinking bandwidth... we gots labels and a fancy RSVP to fix us up!, Dan Kolis, 19:40
- Re: Syntax... Re: Bandwidth? BANDWIDTH. We don't need no stinking bandwidth, Christopher Evans, 17:20
- Syntax... Re: Bandwidth? BANDWIDTH. We don't need no stinking bandwidth, grenville armitage, 16:50
- Bandwidth? BANDWIDTH. We don't need no stinking bandwidth, Dan Kolis, 16:10
- Re: Plenaries at IETF 53, Stephen Casner, 15:10
- Re: Plenaries at IETF 53, Einar Stefferud, 14:30
- Re: Last Call: Message Disposition Notification to Draft Standard, Graham Klyne, 13:10
- Re: Plenaries at IETF 53, John C Klensin, 13:00
January 18, 2002
- RE: comments on Friday scheduling, etc., Wijnen, Bert (Bert), 17:10
- Re: comments on Friday scheduling, etc., Dave Crocker, 16:00
- Re: comments on Friday scheduling, etc., Dave Crocker, 14:30
- Re: comments on Friday scheduling, etc., Randy Bush, 14:00
- SNMPv1 and SNMPv2c to HISTORIC, C. M. Heard, 13:30
- Re: comments on Friday scheduling, etc., Aaron Falk, 12:00
- Re: comments on Friday scheduling, etc., Jon Crowcroft, 11:50
- Re: comments on Friday scheduling, etc., Dave Crocker, 09:30
- Re: Plenaries at IETF 53, Susan Harris, 09:20
- Re: comments on Friday scheduling, etc., Scott Brim, 09:10
- Re: comments on Friday scheduling, etc., Jon Crowcroft, 09:00
- RE: Plenaries at IETF 53, Romascanu, Dan (Dan), 08:50
- Re: Plenaries at IETF 53, Valdis . Kletnieks, 08:40
- Re: Plenaries at IETF 53, Dave Crocker, 08:20
- Re: Plenaries at IETF 53, Henning G. Schulzrinne, 05:40
- Re: comments on Friday scheduling, etc., Henk Uijterwaal (RIPE-NCC), 02:20
January 17, 2002
- Re: comments on Friday scheduling, etc., Sean Doran, 23:50
- Re: comments on Friday scheduling (was Plenaries at IETF 53), Einar Stefferud, 21:20
- Re: comments on Friday scheduling, etc., Ran Atkinson, 19:40
- Re: comments on Friday scheduling (was Plenaries at IETF 53), Bob Hinden, 17:10
- Re: comments on Friday scheduling (was Plenaries at IETF 53), Randy Bush, 15:50
- RE: Plenaries at IETF 53, Tony Hain, 15:10
- Re: comments on Friday scheduling (was Plenaries at IETF 53), Keith Moore, 14:40
- Re: comments on Friday scheduling (was Plenaries at IETF 53), Valdis . Kletnieks, 14:20
- RE: comments on Friday scheduling (was Plenaries at IETF 53), Michel Py, 13:40
- Re: comments on Friday scheduling (was Plenaries at IETF 53), Michael Mealling, 13:30
- Re: Plenaries at IETF 53, Michael Richardson, 13:20
- Re: Plenaries at IETF 53, Holdrege, Matt, 13:10
- Re: Plenaries at IETF 53, Scott Brim, 13:00
- Re: Plenaries at IETF 53, John Border, 12:50
- Re: comments on Friday scheduling (was Plenaries at IETF 53), Dave Crocker, 12:40
- Re: comments on Friday scheduling (was Plenaries at IETF 53), Jeffrey Altman, 12:10
- Re: comments on Friday scheduling (was Plenaries at IETF 53), Rodney Thayer, 11:50
- Strip-O-Text, Mobi-Cam, SMS Party Pack: - Brand New lot`s of FUN!, Entertainment 4 mobile users, 10:13
- Re: Plenaries at IETF 53, Michael Richardson, 10:00
- Re: Plenaries at IETF 53, Michael Richardson, 09:50
- Re: Plenaries at IETF 53, Susan Harris, 08:20
- Re: Plenaries at IETF 53, Matt Crawford, 08:00
- Re: Plenaries at IETF 53, Pekka Savola, 03:30
- Re: Plenaries at IETF 53, Fred Baker, 03:00
January 15, 2002
- MPTP, Wenyue Zhang, 06:39
January 06, 2002
- Re: Empowering the Customer or Empowering the Telco - State of the Internet 2002 (abridged) Published annually to the IETF list, Christopher Evans, 23:00
- Re: one copy sent to list but THREE returned, Christopher Evans, 22:30
- Re: one copy sent to list but THREE returned, Timothy J. Salo, 19:50
- Re: one copy sent to list but THREE returned, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 19:00
- one copy sent to list but THREE returned, Gordon Cook, 15:20
- Empowering the Customer or Empowering the Telco - State of the Internet 2002 (abridged) Published annually to the IETF list, Gordon Cook, 14:59
January 02, 2002
- RE: Conference MIB, Wijnen, Bert (Bert), 09:30
- Re: 128 bit IP addresses, Margaret Wasserman, 07:20
- Conference MIB, Chai Forsher, 07:10
- Re: 128 bit IP addresses, Brian E Carpenter, 06:50
- Re: 128 bit IP addresses, Miguel Angel Rodriguez Jodar, 04:00