Re: IETF 54 calendar

So this means that people who have IPR issues they want to bring to the 
table had better be prepared to stay Friday; most others can leave if they 
want to.

What do people think?


Makes sense to me to schedule it when there are the least conflicts, i.e.,
Friday.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: IPR at IETF 54, (continued) Re: IPR at IETF 54, Robert Elz Re: IPR at IETF 54, Valdis . Kletnieks Re: IPR at IETF 54, Robert Elz Re: IPR at IETF 54, Valdis . Kletnieks Re: IPR at IETF 54, Robert Elz Re: IPR at IETF 54, Valdis . Kletnieks Re: IETF 54 calendar, Keith Moore Re: IETF 54 calendar, Dave Crocker Re: IETF 54 calendar, Keith Moore Re: IETF 54 calendar, Harald Tveit Alvestrand Re: IETF 54 calendar, Susan Harris <= Re: IETF 54 calendar, Marc Blanchet Re: IETF 54 calendar, Julie Kirchhoff

Previous by Date:	Re: TCP/IP, Bill Cunningham
Next by Date:	Re: TCP/IP, Valdis . Kletnieks
Previous by Thread:	Re: IETF 54 calendar, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Next by Thread:	Re: IETF 54 calendar, Marc Blanchet
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]