ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: IPR at IETF 54

2002-05-31 05:45:30
On Fri, 31 May 2002 08:40:17 +0300, Pekka Savola said:

A bad thing IETF could do (but not the worst luckily :-) is to give a
signal "Ok.. feel free to patent and give RAND licensing.. depending how
good it is, we might give it a standards status or we might not".  That
_encourages_ to do patents (or try to), and we want to avoid that.

Patents *in and of themselves* are not a Bad Thing. As far as the IETF goes,
the problem only arises when the patent is used to enforce a restrictive
licensing policy.

Can anybody think of a reason the IETF should object to patented tech *per se*,
as opposed to objecting to *hard-to-license* patented tech (the latter I think
we have consensus as being a Bad Thing)...
-- 
                                Valdis Kletnieks
                                Computer Systems Senior Engineer
                                Virginia Tech

Attachment: pgpjb1xhdedp3.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>