At 05:38 PM 7/7/2002 -0400, Keith Moore wrote:
I do not share your opinion that someone who is interested in a particular
technology has an obligation to follow every WG that might try to alter
that technology. First of all, it's not obvious which groups might do
this-for instance who would guess that
an internet draft filename that contains the string "esmtp" is a pretty
good clue.
and remember that i-d's are announced, including their abstracts. the
abstract for the current specification is pretty straightforward.
d/
ps. to the extent that you perceive a larger, IETF-wide coordination
issue, i suspect you will get agreement from many people. the hard part is
in proposing a solution that those people will also agree with.
----------
Dave Crocker <mailto:dcrocker(_at_)brandenburg(_dot_)com>
Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://www.brandenburg.com>
tel +1.408.246.8253; fax +1.408.850.1850