Yo Christian!
Actually, RFC 3168 has nothing to do with it. The issue is RFC 793.
RFC 793 is a "Standard", not a "Proposed Standard"
RFC 793 lists the bits later used by ECN as "Reserved". Computer programs
are supposed to ignore "Reserved" bits unless they really know what
they are doing.
If a router treats bits in the header as required by the STANDARD RFC
793 then RFC 3168 will cause no harm. I do not have a copy of Baker
handy, but I bet it agrees.
RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 20340 Empire Blvd, Suite E-3, Bend, OR 97701
gem(_at_)rellim(_dot_)com Tel:+1(541)382-8588 Fax: +1(541)382-8676
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, Christian Huitema wrote:
So, if you are on a campaign to promote ECN, then maybe you should first
try to promote this specification to the next standard level... You may
also want to take a stab at revising the "Requirements for IP Version 4
Routers"; the last edition, RFC 1812 by Fred Baker, dates from June
1995.