Re: Why spam is a problem.

The "technical mechanism" of the trust system I previously mentioned on
this list is being _completely_ ignored.


don't take it personally - lots of things are being completely ignored.  

Keith

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Why spam is a problem., (continued) Re: Why spam is a problem., Perry E. Metzger Re: Why spam is a problem., Marshall Rose Re[2]: Why spam is a problem., Richard Welty Re: Re[2]: Why spam is a problem., Keith Moore Re: Why spam is a problem., Bill Sommerfeld Re: Why spam is a problem., Keith Moore Re: Why spam is a problem., Thomas J. Hruska Re: Why spam is a problem., Melinda Shore Re: Why spam is a problem., Thomas J. Hruska Re: Why spam is a problem., Melinda Shore Re: Why spam is a problem., Keith Moore <= Re[2]: Why spam is a problem., Richard Welty Re: Why spam is a problem., Dave Crocker Re: Why spam is a problem., senthil ayyasamy Re: Why spam is a problem., John C Klensin Re: Why spam is a problem., Eric A. Hall Re: Why spam is a problem., Christopher Evans Re: Why spam is a problem., Vernon Schryver Re: Why spam is a problem., Keith Moore Re: Why spam is a problem., Christopher Evans Re: Why spam is a problem., Keith Moore

Previous by Date:	IP"NG" and IPv6 are not the same thing...., Jim Fleming
Next by Date:	Re: Why spam is a problem., Brian Bisaillon
Previous by Thread:	Re: Why spam is a problem., Melinda Shore
Next by Thread:	Re[2]: Why spam is a problem., Richard Welty
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]