Re: Why spam is a problem.

yeah okay, so I am wrong.   i was thinking of the spams i get from 
@hotmail.com
that dont even seem to exist.


you're not wrong - checking the return address for validity does cut down on 
spam.
it's just trickier than it seems to do it in a way that doesn't also block 
legit mail.

Keith

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Why spam is a problem., (continued) Re: Why spam is a problem., Keith Moore Re[2]: Why spam is a problem., Richard Welty Re: Why spam is a problem., Dave Crocker Re: Why spam is a problem., senthil ayyasamy Re: Why spam is a problem., John C Klensin Re: Why spam is a problem., Eric A. Hall Re: Why spam is a problem., Christopher Evans Re: Why spam is a problem., Vernon Schryver Re: Why spam is a problem., Keith Moore Re: Why spam is a problem., Christopher Evans Re: Why spam is a problem., Keith Moore <= Re: Why spam is a problem., Måns Nilsson Re: Why spam is a problem., Caitlin Bestler Re: Why spam is a problem., Perry E. Metzger Re: Why spam is a problem., Caitlin Bestler Re: Why spam is a problem., Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law Re: Why spam is a problem., Eric A. Hall Re: Why spam is a problem., Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law Re[2]: Why spam is a problem., Richard Welty Re: Why spam is a problem., Markku Savela Message not available Re: Why spam is a problem., Markku Savela

Previous by Date:	Re: Why spam is a problem., Dave Crocker
Next by Date:	Re: Why spam is a problem., Keith Moore
Previous by Thread:	Re: Why spam is a problem., Christopher Evans
Next by Thread:	Re: Why spam is a problem., Måns Nilsson
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]