Re: Why spam is a problem.

At 11:11 PM 8/13/2002 -0400, Bill Sommerfeld wrote:

Now, lobby for the creation of laws which subjects someone who sends
spam despite the "no soliciting" sign to a significant fine
($1000.00/message?), payable to the recipient.


how does this help with the massive amount of international spam?

d/


----------
Dave Crocker <mailto:dave(_at_)tribalwise(_dot_)com>
TribalWise, Inc. <http://www.tribalwise.com>
tel +1.408.246.8253; fax +1.408.850.1850

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re[2]: Why spam is a problem., (continued) Re[2]: Why spam is a problem., Richard Welty Re: Re[2]: Why spam is a problem., Keith Moore Re: Why spam is a problem., Bill Sommerfeld Re: Why spam is a problem., Keith Moore Re: Why spam is a problem., Thomas J. Hruska Re: Why spam is a problem., Melinda Shore Re: Why spam is a problem., Thomas J. Hruska Re: Why spam is a problem., Melinda Shore Re: Why spam is a problem., Keith Moore Re[2]: Why spam is a problem., Richard Welty Re: Why spam is a problem., Dave Crocker <= Re: Why spam is a problem., senthil ayyasamy Re: Why spam is a problem., John C Klensin Re: Why spam is a problem., Eric A. Hall Re: Why spam is a problem., Christopher Evans Re: Why spam is a problem., Vernon Schryver Re: Why spam is a problem., Keith Moore Re: Why spam is a problem., Christopher Evans Re: Why spam is a problem., Keith Moore Re: Why spam is a problem., Måns Nilsson Re: Why spam is a problem., Caitlin Bestler

Previous by Date:	Re[2]: Why spam is a problem., Richard Welty
Next by Date:	Re: Why spam is a problem., senthil ayyasamy
Previous by Thread:	Re[2]: Why spam is a problem., Richard Welty
Next by Thread:	Re: Why spam is a problem., senthil ayyasamy
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]