Re: Why spam is a problem.

At 11:33 AM 8/19/2002 -0400, Brian Bisaillon wrote:

Why not provide an optional SMTP extension that would allow administratorsto set a limit on the number of e-mail messages a user can send?

why does that require a protocol change? This sounds like an accountingfunction in either the originating system or its mail server.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Why spam is a problem., (continued) Re: Why spam is a problem., Vernon Schryver Re: Why spam is a problem., Keith Moore Re: Why spam is a problem., John Stracke Re: Why spam is a problem., Eric A. Hall Re: Why spam is a problem., stanislav shalunov Re: Why spam is a problem., kent Re: Why spam is a problem., stanislav shalunov Re: Why spam is a problem., Brian Bisaillon Re: Why spam is a problem., Brian Bisaillon Re: Why spam is a problem., John Stracke Re: Why spam is a problem., Fred Baker <= Re: Why spam is a problem., John C Klensin Re: Why spam is a problem., Dave Crocker

Previous by Date:	Re: Heartbeat between Router and 3rd party box, Fred Baker
Next by Date:	Re: Why spam is a problem., John C Klensin
Previous by Thread:	Re: Why spam is a problem., John Stracke
Next by Thread:	Re: Why spam is a problem., John C Klensin
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]