----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Elz" <kre(_at_)munnari(_dot_)OZ(_dot_)AU>
| Lastly, I am NOT advocating any change. I merely responded
| to an implication that there was no justification for
| handling DNS for IPV6 differently than for IPv4.
There should have been, we should be doing A6 for IPv6, that would
have made lots of sense.
IPv6 and A6 go together....they were made for each other...
...you might want to check with the ICANN Board or the .AU people for more
info...
AAAA is for 128-bit DNS users, and does not imply IPv6...
...as an example....2002:* AAAA records cause IPv4 packets to be produced...
Jim Fleming
2002:[IPv4]:000X:03DB:...IPv8 is closer than you think...
http://ipv8.dyndns.tv
http://ipv8.yi.org
http://ipv8.dyns.cx
http://ipv8.no-ip.com
http://ipv8.no-ip.org
http://ipv8.no-ip.biz
http://ipv8.no-ip.info
http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt