----- Original Message -----
From: "Caitlin Bestler" <caitlinb(_at_)RP(_dot_)ASOMI(_dot_)NET>
To: <ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 4:39 PM
Subject: Re: Multihoming Issues
On 9/4/02, Jim Fleming wrote:
From: "Brian E Carpenter" <brian(_at_)hursley(_dot_)ibm(_dot_)com>
Could we switch this thread to where it belongs (the
multi6 WG)?
=============================
Would it not be more appropriate on an IPv6-based network ?
Why would IPv4 users (here) care about A6 ?
Does that mean that you believe "IPv8" should only be
discussed on "IPv8" networks?
What do you mean by IPv8 ?
Are you familiar with how IPv16 works ?
Have you asked the C(_at_)t ?
http://www.ddj.com/articles/1993/9310/
http://maccentral.macworld.com/news/0208/25.jaguar.php
Jim Fleming
2002:[IPv4]:000X:03DB:...IPv8 is closer than you think...
http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt