----- Original Message -----
From: "Caitlin Bestler" <caitlinb(_at_)RP(_dot_)ASOMI(_dot_)NET>
To: <ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 4:39 PM
Subject: Re: Multihoming Issues
On 9/4/02, Jim Fleming wrote:
From: "Brian E Carpenter" <brian(_at_)hursley(_dot_)ibm(_dot_)com>
Could we switch this thread to where it belongs (the
multi6 WG)?
=============================
Would it not be more appropriate on an IPv6-based network ?
Why would IPv4 users (here) care about A6 ?
Does that mean that you believe "IPv8" should only be
discussed on "IPv8" networks?
IPv8 is just IPv4 in the hands of someone with a clue...
IPv6 is a good resume builder...look at all the money being wasted on it...
By the way....IPv6 continues to crash...
http://www.iht.com/articles/69229.html
PARIS Europe's bold hopes for third-generation mobile-phone services have come
crashing down to earth. By one estimate, perhaps half
of the licenses that West European companies bought two years ago for fast
networks will never be used - meaning $50 billion will
have been spent for nothing."
================================