Re: TCP/IP Terms

I fail to see why this is such a pressing issue.  To be completely
unambiguous, you need to name the protocol.  That identifies the
layer, and then "packet" or "datagram" or what-have-you is
unambiguous.

                                                - Bill

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: TCP/IP Terms, (continued) Re: TCP/IP Terms, Christopher Evans Re: TCP/IP Terms, Bob Braden Re: TCP/IP Terms, Dave Crocker Re: TCP/IP Terms, Valdis . Kletnieks Re: TCP/IP Terms, Dave Crocker TCP/IP Terms, Bill Cunningham Re: TCP/IP Terms, Bob Braden Re: TCP/IP Terms, Bill Cunningham RE: TCP/IP Terms, Michel Py Re: TCP/IP Terms, Bill Cunningham Re: TCP/IP Terms, Bill Sommerfeld <= TCP/IP Terms, Bill Cunningham Re: TCP/IP Terms, Robert Elz Re: TCP/IP Terms, Bill Cunningham Re: TCP/IP Terms, Randy Bush RE: TCP/IP Terms, Michel Py RE: TCP/IP Terms, Michel Py Re: TCP/IP Terms, Bill Cunningham Re: TCP/IP Terms, Joe Touch Re: TCP/IP Terms, Ari Ollikainen Re: TCP/IP Terms, Bill Cunningham

Previous by Date:	Re: TCP/IP Terms, Bill Cunningham
Next by Date:	TCP/IP Terms, Bill Cunningham
Previous by Thread:	Re: TCP/IP Terms, Bill Cunningham
Next by Thread:	TCP/IP Terms, Bill Cunningham
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]