Re: TCP/IP Terms

ietf

Re: TCP/IP Terms

2002-09-28 16:26:34

At 06:15 PM 9/28/2002 -0400, Valdis(_dot_)Kletnieks(_at_)vt(_dot_)edu wrote:

We're the *INTERNET* Engineering Task Force.  The few places where traffic

ABNF has larger application. There is nothing about it that is specific tothe TCP/IP suite.

The same potential exists for an effort to produce an independent volume offormal definitions.


d/


----------
Dave Crocker <mailto:dave(_at_)tribalwise(_dot_)com>
TribalWise, Inc. <http://www.tribalwise.com>
tel +1.408.246.8253; fax +1.408.850.1850

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
TCP/IP Terms, Bill Cunningham Re: TCP/IP Terms, Christopher Evans Re: TCP/IP Terms, Christopher Evans Re: TCP/IP Terms, Bob Braden Re: TCP/IP Terms, Dave Crocker Re: TCP/IP Terms, Valdis . Kletnieks Re: TCP/IP Terms, Dave Crocker <= TCP/IP Terms, Bill Cunningham Re: TCP/IP Terms, Bob Braden Re: TCP/IP Terms, Bill Cunningham RE: TCP/IP Terms, Michel Py Re: TCP/IP Terms, Bill Cunningham Re: TCP/IP Terms, Bill Sommerfeld TCP/IP Terms, Bill Cunningham Re: TCP/IP Terms, Robert Elz Re: TCP/IP Terms, Bill Cunningham Re: TCP/IP Terms, Randy Bush

Previous by Date:	Re: Datagram? Packet? (was : APEX), Lixia Zhang
Next by Date:	TCP/IP Terms, Bill Cunningham
Previous by Thread:	Re: TCP/IP Terms, Valdis . Kletnieks
Next by Thread:	TCP/IP Terms, Bill Cunningham
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]