ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: TCP/IP Terms

2002-09-28 11:06:32
At 09:43 AM 9/28/2002 -0700, Bob Braden wrote:
[Why] do we have to do this all over again?

Bob, perhaps the right model is to start with that text and break it out to a separate document, for independent treatment and citation. (The precedent is ABNF.)

There are two justifications for doing this.

One is that 14 years is long enough to warrant a community review and refinement of the definitions.

The other is that the current round of discussion suggests that there is community interest for consensus on the terms, independent of a particular set of protocols. The current context of the terms is tied to the TCP/IP suite, rather than claiming to be generic to all data networking.

d/

----------
Dave Crocker <mailto:dave(_at_)tribalwise(_dot_)com>
TribalWise, Inc. <http://www.tribalwise.com>
tel +1.408.246.8253; fax +1.408.850.1850



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>