Re: axfr-clarify on the move again

ietf

Re: axfr-clarify on the move again

2002-11-25 07:53:23

DJB> Nobody would fall for it if the document imposed rules relating
DJB> to silly experiments like A6.
              ***********

JM> Lots of snipps, just to remind you that A6 has been moved to
JM> experimental [...]

It's pretty fair assumption that he had already remembered.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: axfr-clarify on the move again, D. J. Bernstein Re: axfr-clarify on the move again, D. J. Bernstein RE: axfr-clarify on the move again, Jeroen Massar Re: axfr-clarify on the move again, Jonathan de Boyne Pollard <= Re: axfr-clarify on the move again, Kenji Rikitake Re: axfr-clarify on the move again, D. J. Bernstein Re: axfr-clarify on the move again, Randy Bush Re: axfr-clarify on the move again, D. J. Bernstein Re: axfr-clarify on the move again, D. J. Bernstein

Previous by Date:	Re: Spring 2003 IETF - Why San Francisco?, John Stracke
Next by Date:	Re: Root Server DDoS Attack: What The Media Did Not Tell You, Paul Vixie
Previous by Thread:	RE: axfr-clarify on the move again, Jeroen Massar
Next by Thread:	Re: axfr-clarify on the move again, Kenji Rikitake
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]