Re: IETF Sub-IP area: request for input

ietf

2002-12-04 17:34:31


I'd prefer Option 3 (as well).  

-danny

[clipped...]


[clipped more...]

 3/ Status quo


[...]

Option 2 would be fine. Option 3 would be ok too.

Yakov.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: IETF Sub-IP area: request for input, RJ Atkinson Re: IETF Sub-IP area: request for input, Fred Baker Re: IETF Sub-IP area: request for input, Paul Hoffman / IMC Re: IETF Sub-IP area: request for input, Lars Eggert Re: IETF Sub-IP area: request for input, Eric Rosen RE: IETF Sub-IP area: request for input, Tony Hain Re: IETF Sub-IP area: request for input, Yakov Rekhter Re: IETF Sub-IP area: request for input, Danny McPherson <= Re: IETF Sub-IP area: request for input, Pyda Srisuresh RE: IETF Sub-IP area: request for input, Sasha Vainshtein Re: IETF Sub-IP area: request for input, Jonathan Lang

Previous by Date:	Re: IETF Sub-IP area: request for input, Yakov Rekhter
Next by Date:	Re: COM? Ho, Bill Cunningham
Previous by Thread:	Re: IETF Sub-IP area: request for input, Yakov Rekhter
Next by Thread:	Re: IETF Sub-IP area: request for input, Pyda Srisuresh
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]