RE: IETF Sub-IP area: request for input

For whatever it is worth, I support Option 3 ("Status quo").

I think that the "hard" decision (currently postponed) will be become
simpler
as we shall see conclusion of some of the WGs curently in the Sub-IP area
and
probably creation of some new ones.

Also why to change something that is working just fine?

With best regards,
                                   Sasha Vainshtein
email:     sasha(_at_)axerra(_dot_)com <mailto:sasha(_at_)axerra(_dot_)com>
tel:       +972-3-7659993 (office)
           +972-8-9254948 (res.)
           +972-58-674833 (cell.)