Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)

Could we PLEASE leave NAT out of the equation? Not all hosts in theworld want or need to be connected outside of the corporate networkthey belong to.


true.  but they still need unique addresses.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Michel Py Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Ted Hardie Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), David Conrad Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Ted Hardie Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), David Conrad Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Ted Hardie Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Daniel Senie RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Jeroen Massar Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Keith Moore <= Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Harald Tveit Alvestrand Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Andrew Newton Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Kurt Erik Lindqvist Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Kurt Erik Lindqvist RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Christian Huitema Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Stephen Sprunk Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Matt Crawford "...handwaving arguments that "something bad might happen"..." ?, Jim Fleming Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Margaret Wasserman RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Tony Hain