RE: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here

    > From: "Tony Hain" <alh-ietf(_at_)tndh(_dot_)net>

    > 'anti-spam' is the wrong focus. Spam is a social problem, not an
    > engineering one.

Sorry, I don't agree with this logic: if it's valid, then why try to design
better locks, since theft is a social problem?

        Noel

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, (continued) Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Anthony Atkielski Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Theodore Ts'o Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Paul Vixie Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Theodore Ts'o Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Bill Cunningham Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Eric A. Hall Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Paul Vixie Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Vernon Schryver Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Bill Sommerfeld Re: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here, Kurt Erik Lindqvist RE: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here, J. Noel Chiappa <= RE: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here, Tony Hain Re: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here, Anthony Atkielski RE: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here, Tony Hain authenticated email, Michael Thomas Re: authenticated email, Harald Tveit Alvestrand Re: authenticated email, Scott Francis Re: authenticated email, Michael Thomas Re: authenticated email, Jari Arkko Re: authenticated email, Theodore Ts'o Re: authenticated email, Jari Arkko