IETF Discussion (date)
June 30, 2003
- Re: concerning draft-josefsson-dns-url-08.txt, Simon Josefsson, 19:05
- Re: concerning draft-josefsson-dns-url-08.txt, Simon Josefsson, 19:01
- Seeking feedback on I-D discussing "public policy considerations", John Morris, 12:02
- Re: A Quantum Cryptography ( QC ) Critique, Valdis . Kletnieks, 10:46
- Re: concerning draft-josefsson-dns-url-08.txt, Zefram, 09:27
- Re: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (l2vpn), Eric Rosen, 08:38
- Re: What review is required for "IETF Consensus"?, Jeff Williams, 07:04
- Re: concerning draft-josefsson-dns-url-08.txt, Paul Vixie, 07:04
- Re: concerning draft-josefsson-dns-url-08.txt, Paul Vixie, 07:04
- Re: Last Call: Routing Extensions in Support of Generalized MPLS vto Proposed Standard, Kireeti Kompella, 03:47
- Re: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (l2vpn), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 03:36
- A Quantum Cryptography ( QC ) Critique, NM Research, 02:52
- Re: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (l2vpn), Paul Vixie, 00:47
June 27, 2003
- Re: concerning draft-josefsson-dns-url-08.txt, hardie, 17:51
- Re: concerning draft-josefsson-dns-url-08.txt, Simon Josefsson, 17:05
- Re: concerning draft-josefsson-dns-url-08.txt, Simon Josefsson, 15:58
- Re: concerning draft-josefsson-dns-url-08.txt, Simon Josefsson, 15:58
- Re: Last Call: A Model for Presence and Instant Messaging to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 10:05
- Re: What review is required for "IETF Consensus"?, todd glassey, 07:20
- Re: concerning draft-josefsson-dns-url-08.txt, Zefram, 02:15
June 26, 2003
- IAB open architecture meeting in Vienna, Leslie Daigle, 22:57
- Re: Last Call: A Model for Presence and Instant Messaging to Proposed Standard, Marshall Rose, 17:27
- Re: Last Call: A Model for Presence and Instant Messaging to Proposed Standard, Vernon Schryver, 17:27
- Re: Last Call: A Model for Presence and Instant Messaging to Proposed Standard, hardie, 17:12
- Re: Last Call: A Model for Presence and Instant Messaging to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 16:43
- Re: concerning draft-josefsson-dns-url-08.txt, Paul Vixie, 16:21
- Re: concerning draft-josefsson-dns-url-08.txt, Zefram, 13:24
- concerning draft-josefsson-dns-url-08.txt, Paul Vixie, 12:43
- microsoft nat comment, S Woodside, 10:57
- RE: 57th IETF - Social Event, Kozdon, Peter, 10:39
- Re: 57th IETF - Social Event, itojun, 09:51
- Re: Last Call: SDP attribute for qualifying Media Formats with Generic Parameters to a Proposed Standard, Colin Perkins, 07:11
June 25, 2003
- SRV (was Re: UPNP was :RE: myth ...), Keith Moore, 16:53
- RE: stupid nat tricks (was Re: UPNP ), Michel Py, 16:52
- Re: stupid nat tricks (was Re: UPNP ), Keith Moore, 16:52
- RE: stupid nat tricks (was Re: UPNP ), Michel Py, 14:40
- Re: Layering purity Re: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (l2vpn), Pekka Savola, 14:29
- Re: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (l2vpn), Pekka Savola, 14:29
- RE: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (l2vpn), Yakov Rekhter, 14:15
- Re: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (l2vpn), Yakov Rekhter, 13:52
- stupid nat tricks (was Re: UPNP ), Keith Moore, 13:37
- Re: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (l2vpn), Yakov Rekhter, 13:28
- Re: UPNP was:RE: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore, 13:12
- Re: UPNP was:RE: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), John Stracke, 13:11
- Re: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (l2vpn), Vernon Schryver, 12:51
- Re: UPNP was:RE: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), John Stracke, 12:10
- Re: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (l2vpn), Yakov Rekhter, 11:22
- Re: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (l2vpn), Yakov Rekhter, 11:16
- UPNP was:RE: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Michel Py, 11:16
- Re: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (l2vpn), Yakov Rekhter, 11:16
June 23, 2003
- RE: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department formally adopts IPv6), Michel Py, 18:56
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Melinda Shore, 18:56
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore, 15:44
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 15:44
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Melinda Shore, 15:44
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore, 12:06
- Re: non-complain mail system at alcatel.com, Paul Vixie, 12:06
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Jonathan Hogg, 12:06
- Re: non-complain mail system at alcatel.com, Dave Crocker, 11:02
- Re AXFR clarify to Draft standard, Dean Anderson, 11:02
- Re: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (l2vpn), Paul Hoffman / IMC, 11:02
- Re: non-complain mail system at alcatel.com, Bob Braden, 11:02
- RE: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Michel Py, 11:02
- axfr-clarify, again, D. J. Bernstein, 09:26
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore, 08:41
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), J. Noel Chiappa, 08:25
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore, 08:25
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), J. Noel Chiappa, 08:25
- Re: non-complain mail system at alcatel.com, vinton g. cerf, 08:25
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), J. Noel Chiappa, 08:25
June 21, 2003
- Re: primary purpose of firewalls, David Morris, 22:36
- RE: primary purpose of firewalls, Michel Py, 19:58
- Re: primary purpose of firewalls, S Woodside, 19:15
- Re: primary purpose of firewalls, David Morris, 17:38
- Re: primary purpose of firewalls, Michael Richardson, 14:41
- UWB - Ultra Wide Band - still experimental, Joe Baptista, 09:13
June 20, 2003
- Re: NATs are NOT Firewalls, Dean Anderson, 17:12
- Checking if signed mail works now, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 14:05
- Re: NATs are NOT Firewalls, Valdis . Kletnieks, 13:44
- replacing NAPT, S Woodside, 13:43
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), S Woodside, 11:35
- Fwd: myth of the great transition, S Woodside, 11:17
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Bob Braden, 10:30
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Vernon Schryver, 08:55
- RE: primary purpose of firewalls, Michel Py, 08:27
- Re: Last Call: SDP attribute for qualifying Media Formats with Generic Parameters to a Proposed Standard, ned . freed, 08:06
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore, 08:04
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Valdis . Kletnieks, 07:57
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), J. Noel Chiappa, 05:42
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore, 05:42
- Re: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (l2vpn), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 01:46
- Re: primary purpose of firewalls, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 01:44
- RE: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), manojd, 01:19
June 19, 2003
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Valdis . Kletnieks, 22:29
- COACHES bof announcement, John Loughney, 22:29
- Re: NAT box spec? (RE: myth of the great transition), james woodyatt, 22:09
- Re: primary purpose of firewalls, Stephen Sprunk, 22:09
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Eric Rescorla, 21:51
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Stephen Sprunk, 21:45
- Re: primary purpose of firewalls, Keith Moore, 21:33
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Michael Thomas, 21:26
- RE: primary purpose of firewalls, Michel Py, 21:05
- Re: primary purpose of firewalls, Keith Moore, 20:31
- RE: primary purpose of firewalls, Michel Py, 20:19
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), James Seng, 20:02
- RE: myth of the great transition, Michel Py, 19:47
- primary purpose of firewalls, Keith Moore, 19:11
- RE: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Michel Py, 19:09
- RE: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Michel Py, 18:56
- Re[4]: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Richard Welty, 18:53
- RE: Re[2]: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Michel Py, 18:32
- RE: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Michel Py, 18:12
- Re: myth of the great transition, S Woodside, 16:44
- Re: myth of the great transition, J. Noel Chiappa, 15:08
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore, 15:01
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Eric Rescorla, 14:54
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Eric Rescorla, 14:42
- Re: myth of the great transition, Melinda Shore, 14:40
- Re: myth of the great transition, S Woodside, 14:30
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Melinda Shore, 14:21
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore, 14:06
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), John Stracke, 14:03
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Eric Rescorla, 13:40
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Melinda Shore, 12:32
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Melinda Shore, 12:30
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore, 12:18
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Michael Thomas, 12:09
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore, 12:07
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Theodore Ts'o, 12:05
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Eric A. Hall, 12:02
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Eric Rescorla, 12:02
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore, 12:02
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), S Woodside, 11:56
- Re: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (l2vpn), Joe Touch, 11:56
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Eric Rescorla, 11:23
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Eric Rescorla, 11:23
- RE: NATs are NOT Firewalls, shogunx, 11:19
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore, 11:16
- Re: NATs are NOT Firewalls, S Woodside, 11:14
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore, 11:14
- use of (the term) NAT considered dangerous, S Woodside, 11:14
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Bob Braden, 11:07
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Eric Rescorla, 11:05
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), ned . freed, 11:03
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Eric Rescorla, 11:00
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), S Woodside, 10:54
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), S Woodside, 10:52
- Re[4]: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Richard Welty, 10:37
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 10:34
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore, 10:33
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Michael Thomas, 10:25
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Eric Rescorla, 10:16
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Eric Rescorla, 10:15
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Eric Rescorla, 10:09
- RE: Re[2]: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Neil Carpenter, 10:09
- Re[2]: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Richard Welty, 09:41
- RE: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Christian Huitema, 09:28
- Re[2]: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Richard Welty, 09:24
- RE: NATs are NOT Firewalls, Michel Py, 09:05
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Paul Vixie, 09:02
- firewall logic (was Re: myth of the great transition), Keith Moore, 08:56
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Richard Shockey, 08:56
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Michael Thomas, 08:47
- Re: myth of the great transition, Peter Deutsch, 08:41
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Peter Deutsch, 08:29
- RE: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Fleischman, Eric, 08:29
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Melinda Shore, 08:21
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore, 08:21
- RE: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Peter Ford, 08:06
- Re: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (l2vpn), Keith Moore, 08:00
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Eric Rescorla, 07:59
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore, 07:59
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Eric Rescorla, 07:38
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Eric Rescorla, 07:27
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Theodore Ts'o, 07:26
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore, 07:17
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Eric Rescorla, 07:17
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Eric Rescorla, 06:59
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore, 06:57
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), J. Noel Chiappa, 06:14
- Layering purity Re: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (l2vpn), grenville armitage, 06:11
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Melinda Shore, 05:28
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), J. Noel Chiappa, 04:44
- Re: SIRs, grenville armitage, 04:42
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore, 03:55
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore, 03:21
- ISPs giving users NATted addresses (was myth of the great transition), Keith Moore, 03:12
- Re: myth of the great transition, Keith Moore, 03:08
- Architectures and frameworks (Re: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks) (l2vpn), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 01:18
- Re: NATs are NOT Firewalls, Daniel Senie, 01:18
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Daniel Senie, 01:10
- RE: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (l2vpn), Pekka Savola, 00:52
- Re: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (l2vpn), Kurt Erik Lindqvist, 00:10
- Re: myth of the great transition, Paul Vixie, 00:08
June 18, 2003
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department, Paul Vixie, 23:48
- Re: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (l2vpn), Kurt Erik Lindqvist, 23:44
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Eric A. Hall, 23:44
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), John Loughney, 23:43
- RE: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Michel Py, 23:40
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), James Seng, 23:40
- Re: NATs are NOT Firewalls, Valdis . Kletnieks, 23:29
- Re: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (l2vpn), Kurt Erik Lindqvist, 23:15
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Valdis . Kletnieks, 23:11
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), James Seng, 23:10
- RE: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Michel Py, 23:07
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Eric Rescorla, 23:06
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Valdis . Kletnieks, 22:54
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department formally adopts IPv6), Einar Stefferud, 22:32
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Valdis . Kletnieks, 22:30
- Re: myth of the great transition, S Woodside, 22:30
- RE: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Michel Py, 22:21
- Re: NATs are NOT Firewalls, S Woodside, 22:21
- Re: myth of the great transition, S Woodside, 22:10
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Eric Rescorla, 21:41
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Valdis . Kletnieks, 21:25
- RE: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (l2vpn), Paul Hoffman / IMC, 21:15
- RE: NATs are NOT Firewalls, Michel Py, 21:13
- Re: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (l2vpn), Eric Rosen, 20:40
- Re: myth of the great transition, Vernon Schryver, 20:26
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Paul Vixie, 20:00
- test mail, Soohong Daniel Park, 19:52
- RE: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (l2vpn), Vach Kompella, 19:00
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Richard Shockey, 18:56
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Eric A. Hall, 18:19
- Re: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (l2vpn), Scott W Brim, 18:18
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), George Michaelson, 17:55
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department formally adopts IPv6), Stephen Sprunk, 17:55
- RE: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (l2vpn), Vernon Schryver, 17:45
- Re: Last Call: LDP DoD Graceful Restart to Draft Standard, Alex Zinin, 17:36
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Paul Vixie, 17:20
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore, 17:14
- RE: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (l2vpn), Paul Hoffman / IMC, 16:59
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Eric Rescorla, 16:58
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore, 16:55
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Eric Rescorla, 16:50
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore, 16:46
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Eric Rescorla, 16:42
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Michael Thomas, 16:32
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore, 16:20
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore, 16:08
- RE: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Fleischman, Eric, 16:08
- NATs are NOT Firewalls, Tomson Eric \(Yahoo.fr\), 16:08
- RE: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Putzolu, David, 15:40
- RE: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 15:30
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore, 15:28
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), J. Noel Chiappa, 15:01
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Michael Thomas, 14:56
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 14:27
- RE: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (l2vpn), Vach Kompella, 14:10
- RE: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (l2vpn), Vach Kompella, 13:58
- RE: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (l2vpn), Vach Kompella, 13:42
- Re: NAT box spec? (RE: myth of the great transition), Keith Moore, 13:39
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Eric A. Hall, 13:38
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore, 13:32
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Melinda Shore, 13:28
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore, 13:24
- Re: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (l2vpn), Melinda Shore, 13:15
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Bob Braden, 13:13
- Re: myth of the great transition, S Woodside, 13:08
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Eric Rescorla, 13:02
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Michael Thomas, 12:58
- Re: myth of the great transition, S Woodside, 12:56
- Re: Last Call: LDP DoD Graceful Restart to Draft Standard, Adrian Farrel, 12:47
- Re: SIRs, S Woodside, 12:46
- RE: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Putzolu, David, 12:45
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), S Woodside, 12:39
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore, 12:37
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Kurt Erik Lindqvist, 12:31
- Re: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (l2vpn), Kurt Erik Lindqvist, 12:28
- Re: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (l2vpn), Uri Blumenthal, 12:25
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Eric Rescorla, 12:23
- Re: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (l2vpn), Scott W Brim, 12:20
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Melinda Shore, 12:16
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore, 11:56
- Network 7, matthew . ford, 11:56
- Re: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (l2vpn), Paul Hoffman / VPNC, 11:54
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Eric Rescorla, 11:53
- RE: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (l2vpn), Randy Bush, 11:53
- Re: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (l2vpn), Ping Pan, 11:53
- Re: NAT box spec? (RE: myth of the great transition), james woodyatt, 11:14
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore, 11:14
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Eric Rescorla, 10:51
- RE: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (l2vpn), Vach Kompella, 10:50
- Re: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (l2vpn), Melinda Shore, 10:46
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore, 10:20
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:17
- RE: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (l2vpn), Vach Kompella, 09:59
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore, 09:55
- Re: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (l2vpn), Bob Braden, 09:33
- RE: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department formally adopts IPv6), Christian Huitema, 08:37
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department formally adopts IPv6), Vernon Schryver, 07:49
- Re: full list for moderated list (was: CLOSE ASRG NOW IT HAS FAILED), Frank Solensky, 07:08
- Re: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (l2vpn), Pekka Savola, 02:27
- Re: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (l2vpn), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 01:33
- Re: full list for moderated list, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 01:32
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 00:34
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department formally adopts IPv6), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 00:17
June 17, 2003
- Re: WG review: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (l2vpn), Pekka Savola, 23:52
- NAT box spec? (RE: myth of the great transition), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 23:08
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Valdis . Kletnieks, 21:56
- Re: CLOSE ASRG NOW IT HAS FAILED, Valdis . Kletnieks, 21:25
- RE: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 20:03
- Re: full list for moderated list, Vernon Schryver, 19:36
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore, 19:05
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department formally adopts IPv6), Keith Moore, 18:55
- Re: full list for moderated list, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 18:44
- RE: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:09
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department formally adopts IPv6), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 12:02
- RE: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department formally adopts IPv6), Michel Py, 11:26
- Re: CLOSE ASRG NOW IT HAS FAILED, Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law, 11:26
- Re: CLOSE ASRG NOW IT HAS FAILED, Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law, 11:20
- Re: SIRs, Bill Manning, 10:21
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department formally adopts IPv6), Dave Crocker, 10:13
- Re: SIRs, Bob Braden, 09:38
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:11
- Re: full list for moderated list, Vernon Schryver, 09:00
- RE: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department formally adopts IPv6), Christian Huitema, 08:58
- RE: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department formally adopts IPv6), Peter Ford, 08:46
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department formally adopts IPv6), Ronald van der Pol, 08:37
- Re: full list for moderated list (was: CLOSE ASRG NOW IT HAS FAILED), James M Galvin, 08:21
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department formally adopts IPv6), Guy T Almes, 08:17
- Re: full list for moderated list (was: CLOSE ASRG NOW IT HAS FAILED), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 08:16
- Re: full list for moderated list (was: CLOSE ASRG NOW IT HAS FAILED), william, 08:07
- Re: full list for moderated list (was: CLOSE ASRG NOW IT HAS FAILED), Randy Bush, 07:55
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department formally adopts IPv6), Bill Manning, 07:49
- Re: full list for moderated list, Vernon Schryver, 07:49
- Re: archiving of spam (was CLOSE ARSG etc...), Vernon Schryver, 07:23
- full list for moderated list (was: CLOSE ASRG NOW IT HAS FAILED), James M Galvin, 07:23
- Re: CLOSE ASRG NOW IT HAS FAILED, Dean Anderson, 07:20
- RE: US Defense Department formally adopts IPv6, vinton g. cerf, 07:18
- CRAPS BOF and WIFI, RickGall1, 07:18
- Re: US Defense Department formally adopts IPv6, Paul Ebersman, 07:10
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department formally adopts IPv6), Anthony Atkielski, 06:46
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department formally adopts IPv6), J. Noel Chiappa, 06:38
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department formally adopts IPv6), Keith Moore, 06:37
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department formally adopts IPv6), Tim Chown, 04:07
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department formally adopts IPv6), J. Noel Chiappa, 03:37
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department formally adopts IPv6), Tim Chown, 03:07
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department formally adopts IPv6), Ronald van der Pol, 02:39
- Re: CLOSE ASRG NOW IT HAS FAILED, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 02:14
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department formally adopts IPv6), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 00:56
June 16, 2003
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department formally adopts IPv6), John C Klensin, 20:18
- Re: SIRs, S Woodside, 19:14
- myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department formally adopts IPv6), Keith Moore, 18:56
- ASRG Censorship and IPR, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 18:20
- Re: archiving of spam (was CLOSE ARSG etc...), Keith Moore, 18:11
- Re: CLOSE ASRG NOW IT HAS FAILED, Vernon Schryver, 17:59
- Re: CLOSE ASRG NOW IT HAS FAILED, David Morris, 16:51
- Re: SIRs, grenville armitage, 16:38
- Re: Impending Publication: draft-iab-service-id-considerations-01.txt, Melinda Shore, 15:46
- Re: CLOSE ASRG NOW IT HAS FAILED, Bill Strahm, 15:36
- Re: CLOSE ASRG NOW IT HAS FAILED, Dean Anderson, 15:15
- Re: Impending Publication: draft-iab-service-id-considerations-01.txt, Zefram, 14:51
- Re: US Defense Department formally adopts IPv6, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 14:40
- Re: CLOSE ASRG NOW IT HAS FAILED, william, 14:39
- Re: archiving of spam (was CLOSE ARSG etc...), Dean Anderson, 14:06
- Re: archiving of spam (was CLOSE ARSG etc...), Vernon Schryver, 14:00
- Re: CLOSE ASRG NOW IT HAS FAILED, Scott W Brim, 13:59
- Re: CLOSE ASRG NOW IT HAS FAILED, Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law, 13:39
- Re: CLOSE ASRG NOW IT HAS FAILED, Dean Anderson, 13:39
- Re: SIRs, Pekka Savola, 13:30
- archiving of spam (was CLOSE ARSG etc...), Keith Moore, 13:13
- SIRs, S Woodside, 12:57
- Re: CLOSE ASRG NOW IT HAS FAILED, Dean Anderson, 12:15
- Re: CLOSE ASRG NOW IT HAS FAILED, Vernon Schryver, 12:11
- Re: CLOSE ASRG NOW IT HAS FAILED, Scott W Brim, 11:54
- Re: CLOSE ASRG NOW IT HAS FAILED, Dean Anderson, 11:26
- Re: CLOSE ASRG NOW IT HAS FAILED, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 11:11
- Re: Recruitment of Experimental SIRs, Scott W Brim, 11:05
- Re: CLOSE ASRG NOW IT HAS FAILED, Michael Thomas, 10:56
- RE: US Defense Department formally adopts IPv6, Christian Huitema, 10:45
- Re: CLOSE ASRG NOW IT HAS FAILED, Vernon Schryver, 10:40
- Re: CLOSE ASRG NOW IT HAS FAILED, Paul Vixie, 09:46
- Re: Recruitment of Experimental SIRs, John C Klensin, 09:28
- RE: US Defense Department formally adopts IPv6, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:05
- National Academies call for papers - Telecom R&D, Phil Hilliard, 07:45
- Re: US Defense Department formally adopts IPv6, Al Arsenault, 06:19
June 15, 2003
- Re: CLOSE ASRG NOW IT HAS FAILED, Vern Paxson, 23:38
- Cellspacing, mo, 22:33
- Re: US Defense Department formally adopts IPv6, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 06:04
- CLOSE ASRG NOW IT HAS FAILED, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 05:35
June 14, 2003
- Re: Recruitment of Experimental SIRs, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 09:47
- Re: US Defense Department formally adopts IPv6, Richard Shockey, 09:21
- Re: US Defense Department formally adopts IPv6, John C Klensin, 07:47
- Re: US Defense Department formally adopts IPv6, Vernon Schryver, 07:44
- Re: US Defense Department formally adopts IPv6, J. Noel Chiappa, 07:12
- Re: US Defense Department formally adopts IPv6, Margaret Wasserman, 06:19
June 13, 2003
- Re: US Defense Department formally adopts IPv6, Dave Crocker, 21:23
- Re: US Defense Department formally adopts IPv6, Anthony Atkielski, 20:14
- Re: Recruitment of Experimental SIRs, grenville armitage, 20:01
- Re: US Defense Department formally adopts IPv6, Randy Bush, 20:00
- US Defense Department formally adopts IPv6, Richard Shockey, 18:41
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-hardie-category-descriptions-00.txt, Mark Allman, 18:08
- Re: Last Call: LDP DoD Graceful Restart to Draft Standard, Adrian Farrel, 15:30
- Implementing IPsec and SSL MIBS? How...., Brookes, Stuart P, 07:07
- Re: This IETF discussion list, Anthony Atkielski, 07:07
June 12, 2003
- Re: This IETF discussion list, Dean Anderson, 13:34
- Re: This IETF discussion list, Clint Chaplin, 12:07
- Re: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here, Clint Chaplin, 11:33
- Re: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here, Clint Chaplin, 11:19
- Re: IMAP v. POP, Lyndon Nerenberg, 10:27
- Re: Certificate / CPS issues, Haren Visavadia, 08:10
- Re: IMAP v. POP, mc, 07:11
- Call for Nominations - Internet Area, Phil Roberts, 07:10
June 11, 2003
- Re: Certificate / CPS issues, Anthony Atkielski, 18:21
- Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Dean Anderson, 15:44
- Internet Area call for nominations, Phil Roberts, 13:38
- RE: Re: Certificate / CPS issues, Haren Visavadia, 06:17
- Re: Certificate / CPS issues, Haren Visavadia, 06:09
- Re: Certificate / CPS issues, Anthony Atkielski, 04:24
- Re: Certificate / CPS issues, Anthony Atkielski, 04:24
- Re: Certificate / CPS issues, Haren Visavadia, 00:31
- Re: Certificate / CPS issues, Haren Visavadia, 00:24
June 10, 2003
- Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, james woodyatt, 22:42
- Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Valdis . Kletnieks, 22:30
- Re: Certificate / CPS issues, John C Klensin, 17:04
- Re: Certificate / CPS issues, Anthony Atkielski, 16:18
- RE: Certificate / CPS issues, John C Klensin, 15:20
- Re: Certificate / CPS issues, Anthony Atkielski, 13:51
- Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, james woodyatt, 10:27
- RE: Certificate / CPS issues, Christian Huitema, 09:31
- Re: Certificate / CPS issues, Anthony Atkielski, 07:14
- RE: Certificate / CPS issues, Haren Visavadia, 04:26
- RE: Certificate / CPS issues, Haren Visavadia, 04:04
- RE: Certificate / CPS issues, Haren Visavadia, 01:51
- RE: Certificate / CPS issues, Haren Visavadia, 01:50
- RE: Certificate / CPS issues, Einar Stefferud, 00:10
June 09, 2003
- RE: Certificate / CPS issues, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 21:58
- RE: Certificate / CPS issues, Einar Stefferud, 20:53
- RE: Certificate / CPS issues, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 20:24
- RE: Certificate / CPS issues, Christian Huitema, 17:46
- RE: Certificate / CPS issues, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 15:25
- RE: Certificate / CPS issues, Haren Visavadia, 10:54
- RE: The spam problem is political (Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam), Haren Visavadia, 09:51
- Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Vernon Schryver, 07:38
- Re: The spam problem is political (Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam), vinton g. cerf, 06:40
- The spam problem is political (Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam), Marc Schneiders, 06:30
- Re: Certificate / CPS issues, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 03:16
- Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Paul Vixie, 03:08
- Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Paul Vixie, 02:55
June 08, 2003
- Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Eric A. Hall, 22:40
- Re: Certificate / CPS issues, Bob Braden, 20:29
- RE: Certificate / CPS issues, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 19:16
- Re: Certificate / CPS issues, Valdis . Kletnieks, 19:06
- Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Bill Cunningham, 18:58
- Re: Certificate / CPS issues, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 18:26
- Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 17:43
- Re: Certificate / CPS issues, Valdis . Kletnieks, 16:46
- Re: Certificate / CPS issues, Valdis . Kletnieks, 16:43
- Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Anthony Atkielski, 16:00
- Re: Certificate / CPS issues, Franck Martin, 14:57
- Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Theodore Ts'o, 11:02
- Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Dean Anderson, 10:20
- Send the problem not to ICANN but to ... (Was: Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam), Marc Schneiders, 09:04
- Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Anthony Atkielski, 07:23
- RE: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Tomson Eric \(Yahoo.fr\), 07:08
- Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Vernon Schryver, 06:45
- Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Bill Sommerfeld, 06:06
- RE: Certificate / CPS issues, Haren Visavadia, 03:47
- RE: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Haren Visavadia, 03:36
- RE: Certificate / CPS issues, Haren Visavadia, 03:31
- Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Anthony Atkielski, 02:21
- Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Anthony Atkielski, 02:19
- Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Paul Vixie, 00:41
- Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Paul Vixie, 00:39
June 07, 2003
- Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Theodore Ts'o, 21:57
- Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Vernon Schryver, 21:20
- Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Paul Vixie, 18:59
- Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Vernon Schryver, 18:14
- Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Eric A. Hall, 18:14
- Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Anthony Atkielski, 17:16
- Re: The spam problem is political (Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam), Anthony Atkielski, 17:14
- Re: Certificate / CPS issues, Valdis . Kletnieks, 16:48
- Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Paul Vixie, 16:38
- Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Paul Vixie, 16:28
- Re: Habeas and spam, Anthony Atkielski, 15:56
- Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Anthony Atkielski, 15:51
- The spam problem is political (Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam), Marc Schneiders, 15:44
- Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Eric A. Hall, 14:59
- Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Spencer Dawkins, 14:11
- Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Vernon Schryver, 13:52
- Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Daniel Senie, 13:30
- Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Eric A. Hall, 12:42
- Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Paul Vixie, 11:57
- Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Paul Vixie, 11:53
- Habeas and spam, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:09
- Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Dave Crocker, 08:03
- Re: Certificate / CPS issues, Anthony Atkielski, 04:16
- Re: Re[2]: Certificate / CPS issues, Anthony Atkielski, 04:09
- Re: Certificate / CPS issues, Anthony Atkielski, 04:06
- RE: Certificate / CPS issues, Haren Visavadia, 00:47
June 06, 2003
- Re: Certificate / CPS issues, Valdis . Kletnieks, 22:11
- Re: Certificate / CPS issues, Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law, 21:56
- Re[2]: Certificate / CPS issues, Richard Welty, 20:48
- Re: Certificate / CPS issues, Valdis . Kletnieks, 20:05
- Re: Certificate / CPS issues, Anthony Atkielski, 16:19
- Re: Certificate / CPS issues, Graham Klyne, 14:36
- RE: Certificate / CPS issues, Haren Visavadia, 13:45
- RE: Certificate / CPS issues, Haren Visavadia, 13:17
- Re: Certificate / CPS issues, Einar Stefferud, 13:05
- RE: Certificate / CPS issues, David Morris, 13:05
- RE: Certificate / CPS issues, Haren Visavadia, 11:48
- Re: Certificate / CPS issues, Al Arsenault, 11:31
- RE: Certificate / CPS issues, Pete Resnick, 11:20
- RE: Certificate / CPS issues, Haren Visavadia, 11:05
- RE: Certificate / CPS issues, Haren Visavadia, 10:56
- RE: Certificate / CPS issues, Haren Visavadia, 10:40
- Habeas (was: Certificate / CPS issues), Dave Aronson, 10:40
- RE: Certificate / CPS issues, David Morris, 10:32
- RE: Certificate / CPS issues, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:16
- Re: Certificate / CPS issues, Zefram, 09:50
- RE: Certificate / CPS issues, Pete Resnick, 09:31
- RE: Certificate / CPS issues, Dan Kohn, 08:50
- RE: Certificate / CPS issues, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:08
- Re: Certificate / CPS issues, Graham Klyne, 06:34
- Re: authenticated email, Haren Visavadia, 04:07
- RE: authenticated email, Haren Visavadia, 03:57
- RE: Certificate / CPS issues, Haren Visavadia, 03:45
- Re: authenticated email, Anthony Atkielski, 03:31
- Re: Certificate / CPS issues, Anthony Atkielski, 03:20
- RE: authenticated email, Haren Visavadia, 02:28
- RE: authenticated email, Haren Visavadia, 02:17
- RE: Certificate / CPS issues, Haren Visavadia, 02:16
June 05, 2003
- [Fwd: Re: Progress on the Anti-Spam HOWTO], Franck Martin, 16:46
- Re: Result of test - authenticated email, David Morris, 13:18
- Re: authenticated email, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 12:48
- Certificate / CPS issues, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:47
- Re: authenication email, Anthony Atkielski, 12:45
- Re: authenticated email, Anthony Atkielski, 12:45
- Re: IETF Standards Process, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 12:16
- Re: authenication email, Haren Visavadia, 10:59
- RE: authenticated email, Haren Visavadia, 10:50
- Re: authenticated email, Dean Anderson, 09:11
- Re: Result of test - authenticated email, Keith Moore, 08:22
- Result of test - authenticated email, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:28
- Re: authenticated email, Uri Blumenthal, 06:42
- Re: discussion redirect, Keith Moore, 06:42
- discussion redirect, Eric A. Hall, 06:35
- Re: IMAP v. POP, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 04:18
- Result of test - authenticated email, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 04:05
- Re: authenticated email, Anthony Atkielski, 01:28
- Re: authenticated email, Anthony Atkielski, 01:08
- Re: authenticated email, Einar Stefferud, 00:45
June 04, 2003
- Re: authenticated email, Franck Martin, 18:10
- Re: authenticated email, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 18:06
- Re: This IETF discussion list, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 17:40
- RE: IMAP v. POP (Was: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here), Michel Py, 16:58
- Re: authenticated email, Anthony Atkielski, 14:51
- Re: IMAP v. POP (Was: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here), Anthony Atkielski, 14:44
- Re: IMAP v. POP (Was: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here), Anthony Atkielski, 14:27
- Re: authenticated email, Anthony Atkielski, 14:07
- Re: authenticated email, Anthony Atkielski, 14:05
- Re: This IETF discussion list, Randy Presuhn, 13:24
- Re: Stray question, (a little bit) (What's the best practice on this?), John C Klensin, 12:38
- Re: authenticated email, Michael Thomas, 12:36
- Re: IETF Standards Process, Dean Anderson, 12:33
- Re: authenticated email, Michael Thomas, 12:22
- Re: authenticated email, Michael Thomas, 11:46
- Re: IETF Standards Process, Valdis . Kletnieks, 11:43
- Stray question, (a little bit) (What's the best practice on this?), Dan Kolis, 11:42
- Re: authenticated email, Stephen Sprunk, 11:29
- Re: authenticated email, Stephen Sprunk, 11:17
- Re: authenticated email, Theodore Ts'o, 11:10
- Authenticated Email, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:05
- RE: Last 7 days on the IETF list, Avi Lior, 10:34
- IMAP v. POP, Dan Kolis, 10:28
- RE: IMAP v. POP (Was: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here), Michel Py, 09:58
- Re: authenticated email, Alexandru Petrescu, 09:58
- Re: IMAP v. POP (Was: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here), Dave Crocker, 09:44
- Re: IETF Standards Process, Dean Anderson, 09:43
- Re: IMAP v. POP, Stephen Sprunk, 09:35
- RE: This IETF discussion list, Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law, 09:04
- RE: This IETF discussion list, Michel Py, 09:04
- RE: This IETF discussion list, william, 09:02
- Re: [johnmacsgroup] Internet Voting and user participation systems - Research question from Baptista, Jeff Williams, 08:53
- Re: Protocol Action: NOPEER community for BGP route scope control to BCP, john heasley, 08:52
- discussion redirect, Eric A. Hall, 08:52
- Re: Approved, auto-responder, 08:51
- IMAP v. POP, Dan Kolis, 08:32
- RE: This IETF discussion list, Dean Anderson, 08:18
- Re: authenticated email, Vernon Schryver, 08:18
- Re: authenticated email, Alexandru Petrescu, 07:49
- Re: authenticated email, Alexandru Petrescu, 07:49
- Re: authenticated email, Alexandru Petrescu, 07:40
- Re: Last 7 days on the IETF list, Marc Schneiders, 07:37
- Re: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here, Terry Gray, 07:36
- Re: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here, Terry Gray, 07:36
- Re: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here, Terry Gray, 07:33
- RE: IMAP v. POP (Was: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here), Terry Gray, 07:23
- Re: authenticated email, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 07:04
- Re: authenticated email, Alexandru Petrescu, 07:02
- Re: authenticated email, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 07:00
- Re: authenticated email, Alexandru Petrescu, 06:58
- Re: authenticated email, Jari Arkko, 05:30
- Re: authenticated email, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 04:50
- Re: authenticated email, Theodore Ts'o, 04:48
- Re: authenticated email, Alexandru Petrescu, 04:15
- Re: authenticated email, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 02:03
- Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 00:54
June 03, 2003
- Re: authenticated email, Jari Arkko, 23:19
- Re: IETF Standards Process, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 22:59
- RE: This IETF discussion list, Michael Thomas, 20:58
- RE: This IETF discussion list, Michel Py, 19:27
- Re: This IETF discussion list, Richard Perlman, 19:12
- RE: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Tony Hain, 18:16
- RE: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here, Tony Hain, 18:11
- RE: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Tony Hain, 18:07
- Re: authenticated email, Franck Martin, 17:55
- Re: authenticated email, Michael Thomas, 16:18
- Re: authenticated email, Scott Francis, 15:37
- Re: This IETF discussion list, Dean Anderson, 15:29
- IETF Standards Process, Dean Anderson, 14:47
- Re: authenticated email, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 14:41
- Re: This IETF discussion list, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 14:27
- Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Valdis . Kletnieks, 09:56
- authenticated email, Michael Thomas, 09:55
- Re: automagically whitelisting legit mailing lists, Eric A. Hall, 09:18
- Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 09:18
- Re: Mailing list or bust (was Spam, nasty exchanges, and the like), Keith Moore, 08:42
- automagically whitelisting legit mailing lists, Dave Aronson, 08:31
- Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Dave Aronson, 08:28
- Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Dave Aronson, 08:18
- Internet Voting and user participation systems - Research question from Baptista, Joe Baptista, 08:18
- Re: Last warning: Please turn down the volume, Anthony Atkielski, 06:59
- Last warning: Please turn down the volume, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 06:23
- Complaint from John Klensin against Dean Anderson, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 05:01
- Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Anthony Atkielski, 03:44
- Re: Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 02:36
June 02, 2003
- Re: Mailing list or bust (was Spam, nasty exchanges, and the like), Anthony Atkielski, 23:52
- RE: Mailing list or bust (was Spam, nasty exchanges, and the like), Tomson Eric \(Yahoo.fr\), 23:14
- Re: Mailing list or bust (was Spam, nasty exchanges, and the like), Anthony Atkielski, 22:02
- Re: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here, Anthony Atkielski, 21:58
- Re: Mailing list or bust (was Spam, nasty exchanges, and the like), Valdis . Kletnieks, 19:54
- Re: requiring payment (was spam), Dave Crocker, 18:52
- Mailing list or bust (was Spam, nasty exchanges, and the like), Eliot Lear, 18:42
- Engineering to deal with the social problem of spam, Dave Crocker, 18:35
- Re: requiring payment (was spam), Stephen Kent, 18:15
- Re: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here, Eric A. Hall, 17:54
- RE: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here, Tony Hain, 16:56
- Re: This IETF discussion list, Dave Crocker, 16:42
- Re: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here, David Morris, 16:34
- "spam is a social problem, not an engineering one", Keith Moore, 15:58
- RE: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here, J. Noel Chiappa, 15:51
- Re: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here, Eric A. Hall, 15:28
- RE: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here, Tony Hain, 14:35
- Recruitment of Experimental SIRs, Dave Crocker, 13:33
- Re: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here, Anthony Atkielski, 13:11
- Re: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here, Valdis . Kletnieks, 12:53
- Re: Last 7 days on the IETF list, Kurt Erik Lindqvist, 01:56
June 01, 2003
- Re: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here, Kurt Erik Lindqvist, 23:53
- Re: DNS RMX RR draft, Dave Crocker, 23:04
- Re: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here, Spencer Dawkins, 18:51
- Re: The IETF_Censored mailing list, Spencer Dawkins, 15:57
- Re: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 15:52
- Re: The IETF_Censored mailing list, David Morris, 15:12
- Re: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here, Vernon Schryver, 15:02
- Re: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here, Anthony Atkielski, 15:00
- Re: This IETF discussion list, Anthony Atkielski, 14:32
- Re: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 14:19
- Re: DNS RMX RR draft, Spencer Dawkins, 13:53
- Re: The IETF_Censored mailing list, Dean Anderson, 12:37
- Re: This IETF discussion list, Dave Aronson, 12:30
- Re: DNS RMX RR draft, Dave Crocker, 12:12
- Re: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here, Dave Aronson, 12:06
- Re: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here, David Morris, 11:02
- This IETF discussion list, Tomson Eric \(Yahoo.fr\), 10:56
- DNS RMX RR draft, Ofer Inbar, 10:52
- Re: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here, Dave Aronson, 10:17
- RE: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here, Tomson Eric \(Yahoo.fr\), 10:12
- Re: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here, Valdis . Kletnieks, 02:50
- Re: Spam, Anthony Atkielski, 01:57
- Re: Spam, Anthony Atkielski, 01:52
- guessing and trying (was re: spam), Paul Vixie, 01:44
- Re: Answering questions and defamation (was: RE: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here), Anthony Atkielski, 01:38
- Re: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here, Anthony Atkielski, 01:33
- Re: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here, Anthony Atkielski, 01:33