Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly ad

The UPNP "Internet Gateway Device" working group and the MIDCOM WG effort
started at about the same time, but the UPNP specification was published
about 2 years ago, while MIDCOM is not quite finished yet. Looks like an
interesting case study for the "problem statement" working group...


producing bad stuff more quickly is not what I would regard as a useful goal.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), (continued) Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Jonathan Hogg Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Melinda Shore Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), J. Noel Chiappa Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), J. Noel Chiappa Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore RE: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Michel Py RE: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Christian Huitema Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6), Keith Moore <=

Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly adopts IPv6)