Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly ad

on 6/18/2003 5:37 PM Keith Moore wrote:

> you're simply wrong about that, at least for anything resembling
> today's NATs.  except for a shortage of IPv4 addresses, NATs would not
> be needed at all.
...and a routing grid that could handle a squared table size. No use in
opening allocations to everybody that can justify ~/29 if filters are
still going to be dropping everything after /20.

-- 
Eric A. Hall                                        http://www.ehsco.com/
Internet Core Protocols          http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/