RE: myth of the great transition (was US Defense Department forma lly a

> NAT is a denial of service attack, not a means of policy enforcement.
I wonder if NAT is to ietf discussions as Nazis was 
to Usenet discussions.

That is, will every heated IETF debate eventually lead to
invoking the NAT bogyman?

And if that where to be true, would the corollary apply
that the discussion is no longer fruitful?

Cheers,
David