--On mandag, juni 16, 2003 12:45:34 -0600 Vernon Schryver
<vjs(_at_)calcite(_dot_)rhyolite(_dot_)com> wrote:
The suggestion of having two lists, one filtered and a second named
whatever-noise, both with open archives, sounds fine to me, but wouldn't
help the ASRG case. I think that the ASRG case would be instantly
resolved if the moderator would publish all of the rejected messages
and related corresponce without any additional commentary...not that
I think there's any case there, but passers-by might not have seen the
first several weeks of traffic in the ASRG mailing list not to mention
those "courtesy" copies I mentioned.
the ICANN DNSO GA list operated with "ga" and "ga-full" lists ("full" being
all spam, crosspostings and postings from moderated posters in addition to
the normal list traffic).
the ga-full list was, I believe, not archived.
it served to silence the complaints that it wouldn't be possible to see if
moderation was fair or not, which richly repaid the work of setting it up -
I think it had approximately 5 memebers.
Harald